[nfsv4] Upcoming IETF 97 – Seoul, South Korea - Nov. 13-18

spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com> Mon, 22 August 2016 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2E112D19E for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6a4jbdKatioX for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06BEC12B02F for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n128so94101325ith.1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UlKFkFxkYmZj2LHwcp/fXgm9CNov9qrNOJu/DjGJmyk=; b=Z5a22/GphQJLjpe9yXM67mTxwLYwqwEIn9dyiI4QE6+9EUqxXvfzrZSBULIsb3G5It lU+8fcy/hrsEbkkJp+yeElRB0kJpG1/ROoRXjDQ7DTcmE7J7o0VGXmHxxOYqxkdLsC3o 4hvOOcLthzenKQpokOvdhNAIOcSbn+j8B5O6iDFNJI08Wr3bBO6qqPolVbUappcnwiyg S/iQzL3RAHDpZnR8UhXYhOqeC6b7n58k3CUHwozYREXYLw9FCNiU/wXz4skeUkJPvXjE kyTqi+cUptOm7/3D5yO4G/sVZ4G4qd9cfoVuO5QRcu1olsAQp27e7plg3wjDeXHliSWF lKGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UlKFkFxkYmZj2LHwcp/fXgm9CNov9qrNOJu/DjGJmyk=; b=Bwp1YuIAqvnxB59q6CaPZPL82ClRFK6XhE8PvVQW3gibgUFdPVr/HNlVR4+6VFCztA S58rPB4E7n4hGOtvrZZb+/uB1pzWTTiWTHKh8iAPJcVAGOexKvbJJ3CiNZkk+eGzArwA WPjWiofbXxhBajg9TuptX7T5s4nYRW/VafaCdFBcT8yr7w08tQabnPgS2Gm7lMqu7A5f CDyyulbXr+0EfwpEVtOiJfaAChcGSal9aywKh0jn6/RHN6EraaUcODdRio0nV/YAxWde GePKvSOy5CQNZ3mxO4rx6PUjssCCyMHnJPcQSVLvK+fE87T8ExmtVrdMiV6iU5GYQS+F PKAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvukwFJvuwNpXZjvEeVi/hT+iQtQckrlqV3p5i5kTtp53p21giHp5dVwKTobab0kX2Rq3v+7caSaIhwgQ==
X-Received: by 10.36.129.213 with SMTP id q204mr23170724itd.38.1471890324161; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.118.145 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFt6Ba=KgTMyBgCp9-SDTiGEKCVD_tbmgDDRz+1Ui2KQg+83gQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c08b1fceb8a29053aad2bc7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/WhuCKVNG1u8vcZXbLh1HtvRDnyI>
Subject: [nfsv4] Upcoming IETF 97 – Seoul, South Korea - Nov. 13-18
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:25:26 -0000

Hi. Meeting requests are now open for the next IETF meeting.

The deadline for requests is Sept 30th.

I would like to know who plans to attend IETF 97 in an effort to decide if
we will have an in-person meeting.

Also, please consider using design conference calls to move review /
comments forward in the WG.

Spencer