IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Can we make draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-02 a WG item?

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Mon, 05 May 2014 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EB31A0324 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 05:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3wtghf6mDhp for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 05:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22d.google.com (mail-oa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE401A031E for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 05:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l6so1001086oag.32 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 May 2014 05:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mizDW5zZcOS2SWAHZ1tj9/Rd5Ls1oZqKixvDRIWgUGk=; b=0Oe0TSOsc90f1LwBTTjd7UyJLzlP15pY/ealqXBzreDrFHbE7qQt6UTb3mDtswQfNb pwAHA8dq1F8NQ6cReGU925YWUZBwykmDtCyGEv2gDVJh9rgXpXxzHjyhMOcF82j6tZw1 M9TAzqYoU59tF/XHot+dI4AOfP8jQBCx4BeeJwiy3gzBrn9fw1z08L+Pcm+iqt++s0T6 9oOTr/xkt/y9zAD2lHZGCfFYni7dAPwiSpZjft33rUDUTUeCHW6j8Eu0O2d39qjFVprM Nj6PFoBcGFwXUsFJFHSoK1v03wY8UWKtbF3zELLjHkb4hInbMeWrjaKOqY5Xn17QQ1jC m6VQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.15.38 with SMTP id u6mr32685802oec.26.1399294639262; Mon, 05 May 2014 05:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.88.73 with HTTP; Mon, 5 May 2014 05:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c8e87c080ff9450e816b794d8c0eed84@BL2PR03MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <5643C90C-D579-4344-9C7D-16FA563FB5BD@primarydata.com> <c8e87c080ff9450e816b794d8c0eed84@BL2PR03MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 08:57:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jdCpbEa_2ofN-KMCQepqgj9aSWOuKH4+XAOBaCBkg8OGw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
To: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013cc024e8d05004f8a6ab9c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/WiM-maIynq7FdoWB8OuNZLWP8sc
Cc: nfsv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Can we make draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-02 a WG item?
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 12:57:26 -0000

It seems to me that this is a good idea.  Tom identified a gap within
RFC5661 and has done a good job in starting to fill it.  The working group
should discuss the details as part of the process of getting this new
document ready for publication as an RFC

I haven't reviewed the document in its entirety, but I have some
suggestions regarding the abstract etc:


   - There is a mismatch between the document name and the title.
    Provisionally suggest "Considerations for New pNFS Layout *Types*".
   - In the abstract, suggest changing "trying to specify" to "specifying
   and evaluating".
   - Also in that same sentence, suggest changing "may be" to "has been".
   - I believe that it would be appropriate to mark the resultant working
   group document as "updating (when approved), rfc5661".
   - Also suggest deleting "new" in the title and changing "considerations"
   to "requirements", making the title "Requirements for pNFS Layout Types"



On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>wrote:

>
> Any comment from others in the WG about Tom's request?
>
> Spencer
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nfsv4 [mailto:nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tom Haynes
> > Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2014 5:50 AM
> > To: nfsv4
> > Subject: [nfsv4] Can we make draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-02 a WG
> > item?
> >
> > Hi Spencer,
> >
> > Can we make this a WG item?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> > Considerations for a New pNFS Layout Type
> >                  draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-02.txt
> >
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> >
> >    This document provides help in distinguishing between the
> >    requirements for Network File System (NFS) version 4.1's Parallel NFS
> >    (pNFS) and those those specifically directed to the pNFS File Layout.
> >    The lack of a clear separation between the two set of requirements
> >    may be troublesome for those trying to specify new Layout Types.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email