Re: [nfsv4] request last call for draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-01.txt
David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 17:00 UTC
Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38001295C9 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jxhjf1X006ak for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37CD11295B3 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id d132so106045275oib.2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2EojY1AnKhnyrEN9gltQ+9oVWvvfc7hDyhGaSi/E+jw=; b=FWfNJ6NK6P5I4qVsoGTOEe7KYbv11ShRJXvAwejIr0iACuM45vfOYA9TK+5KErfiLI FXI97vtV8R26dGbUlwzsUoEB23yDtRNuLVLBZlmyN3wh8cCdgOS6Puos3d4NdkGKi4as lxu/Y4/kknL9rp+nN74GvfSxkPx/bNyLq8OwjQLxR7JD1hTw5mU+z97xqmTyZh+lQPVL L7HHkUATASI6ZEMH0S6AG5KD1lbMo/emR8vYo2mrwzLATmCFEw/jBIzdKawjC0xveL33 2jg/N3Q+QIDSnBIi17jP0GWfId8dVsqUZx+eqIfcO8e/DCZ4W/jd7zuwa7arBGegr9Qy lweg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2EojY1AnKhnyrEN9gltQ+9oVWvvfc7hDyhGaSi/E+jw=; b=X9ObXxoQwza5QxDKRsw7CY1JxAstAySlxXG3j4HeIQXCJ9moMp8WBbZL1pUdy+VnCj 4srm0p+IejXAEyWriDL4VzoLZxqwkiKt6eOGNAoKirjUgTjsg7XNB16Ja0Afnwg48I83 TxUEZ4TSY3FtiQo0lfgtMP5uBBBCH4ZrCkIU+Y6uvbOAmd/rA1DCO3VfxOzVKvYu4VN0 X2j45/I8/MFKoGorlY8QP8G3Dsgx79mYKxjsLMEPcuVjFMWTDBlw+CmAO0EVLXLbQcuD rhCueHMiqsyM9XxhAH1Qplebep4hd6iLQ3Fn0S8UTzUNbHGUX/5+35SQeXNUXinoX+uC 8mPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlN+I35ZK1oYBCpNmnxpecm1hTRGeI/XiZDvYVXJoTvseHWYKvgB/q5JqIet3HqT1Wk//Cpo47HjYudNg==
X-Received: by 10.202.240.194 with SMTP id o185mr5157876oih.111.1476378034589; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.45.4 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161003143530.GD3324@fieldses.org>
References: <147525203984.20506.3175606613169778651.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20160930170606.GC3857@fieldses.org> <20161003143530.GD3324@fieldses.org>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:00:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jdbA6Hqdc1VBRCDq0pSbH+zbqbA_0gW+Ae6c-onPtWteQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0958744e54a8053ec20c16"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/Y4-7qGmgBJTQdhFHc_Egfx35mWQ>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] request last call for draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-01.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:00:37 -0000
Given that it has been ten days since Bruce requested last call on draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-02, I suspect that his request has been lost somehow. It may have been that the quick succession of nearly identical versions contributed to this. Nevertheless, his request was appropriately made and I see no reason to delay starting WGLC on this document further. In any case, I am anticipating submitting draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning-07 in the next week and will be requesting WGLC on that. The two documents would probably be ready for IESG consideration at about the same time, as discussed at IETF96. Although the authors have not yet requested WGLC on draft-ietf-nfsv4-xattrs-03, I understand the document is ready and might well be considered as part of the same package.
- [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-01.txt internet-drafts
- [nfsv4] request last call for draft-ietf-nfsv4-um… J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] request last call for draft-ietf-nfsv… J. Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] request last call for draft-ietf-nfsv… David Noveck
- Re: [nfsv4] request last call for draft-ietf-nfsv… Manoj Naik
- Re: [nfsv4] request last call for draft-ietf-nfsv… J. Bruce Fields