Re: [nfsv4] My probable non-participation in IETF114 meeting -- missing agenda items

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 26 July 2022 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DA0C14F749 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mit.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LFT9Nmmkm4pA for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7D8C16ECD8 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu (c-73-169-244-254.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.169.244.254]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 26Q2L0rm007568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:21:07 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mit.edu; s=outgoing; t=1658802068; bh=3dK+B036BIZnfZcWgV/n8U5Of9A5DSmKQlCcTLMZJs0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=U75ixnjRKaMaiHJZkixaKutwLG9Mv3qDCZfPzfweFVnveGZhSJSkcidbU1icDiedR Evd/jsXL54OT9tEKD/moCCFYqCLg/NLR8kx5DekAENkLf0nMWunvROpRIfQC7yAxh9 2lkcVEDqQHGcjtznkjnPMRAC6GmGOsXWBC6nXiU2asQTnbemNG8hesKOHvKJMoTIpS QaTxzay+Ub14BG4k1lfkJItX6HoTWW1bizECHKmfk8h4+1wy93bU3iW8QUPZKn+NRo //4GbEDMhHf7sAGplZgq9gNxJ9m5lo6IjBXccYVVHEgtwWHdGZrRYKETqL1bD2MHbj b3t/bo4LaQjfQ==
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:21:00 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: "Noveck, David" <David.Noveck@netapp.com>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20220726022100.GD30255@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <MN2PR06MB5597E737F236E8E35C02380FE18C9@MN2PR06MB5597.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR06MB5597E737F236E8E35C02380FE18C9@MN2PR06MB5597.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/YiUGojGPPIBY1ysnPjPTZ6AUZ5Q>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] My probable non-participation in IETF114 meeting -- missing agenda items
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 02:21:39 -0000

Hi David,

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 01:05:25PM +0000, Noveck, David wrote:
> 
>   *   draft-ietf-nfsv4-internationalization is now expired.  In order to get it anywhere wglc, I have to address the issues in section 12.
> 
> I haven't been able to get idna information from the working group or the internationalization people. Please provide viable sources on email.  Ifno willing experts are to be found, will need to do further research and may have to update 7530 to not support idna, if that is possible.

While I don't consider myself an internationalization person, I do know a
few who would probably qualify.  Please forgive my only sporadic
attentiveness to this list -- is there a clean summary of the open issues
that I could send to people and ask for help?

Thanks,

Ben