Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-11.txt

Hi, Chuck,

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

>
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-11.txt
> > Date: March 27, 2017 at 9:18:28 AM EDT
> > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> > Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 of the
> IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : Remote Direct Memory Access Transport for
> Remote Procedure Call, Version One
> >        Authors         : Charles Lever
> >                          William Allen Simpson
> >                          Tom Talpey
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-11.txt
> >       Pages           : 54
> >       Date            : 2017-03-27
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document specifies a protocol for conveying Remote Procedure
> >   Call (RPC) messages on physical transports capable of Remote Direct
> >   Memory Access (RDMA).  It requires no revision to application RPC
> >   protocols or the RPC protocol itself.  This document obsoletes RFC
> >   5666.
> >
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-11
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-11
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-11
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
> Spencer-
>
> I believe this revision addresses recent SECDIR issues, and
> is ready to proceed. Sorry for the delay.
>

I sent the approved e-mail a few minutes ago - thank you for the update!

Spencer (D - that's the Spencer you meant, right?)