[nfsv4] Discussion topic request for Beijing
sfaibish <sfaibish@emc.com> Mon, 18 October 2010 20:02 UTC
Return-Path: <sfaibish@emc.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E5B3A6BB3 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.334, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kuIidlUapiKB for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBAF3A6AD7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si04.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI04.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.24]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o9IK3l6R006367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:03:48 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.145]) by hop04-l1d11-si04.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:03:44 -0400
Received: from usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com (USENSFAIBISL2E.eng.emc.com [10.238.120.90]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o9IK3a3H019618; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:03:37 -0400
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:03:36 -0400
To: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>, nfsv4 list <nfsv4@ietf.org>
From: sfaibish <sfaibish@emc.com>
Organization: EMC
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"; charset="iso-8859-15"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <op.vksfcafaunckof@usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Win32)
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Subject: [nfsv4] Discussion topic request for Beijing
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:02:26 -0000
Spencer,
I want to have a 10 minutes to discuss the issues we found
with the pNFS block signature and disk protection issues;
"Disk protection issue of pNFS block layout" - 10 minutes.
Thank you very much
/Sorin
--
Best Regards
Sorin Faibish
Corporate Distinguished Engineer
Unified Storage Division
EMC²
where information lives
Phone: 508-249-5745
Cellphone: 617-510-0422
Email : sfaibish@emc.com