IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] State of NFSv4 implementations ( who is active )

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9321208D0 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ykNvHdBvXT4i for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C740B120920 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id g81so6243860oib.8 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GFEIjBcKBcP6n40Ck7UabQV8Q30XprVDpg6Wcz7ABz0=; b=TXh77dVff7iA12f+WTBkPK/MGm1xfUMcPorEV+YysQprc3O6vwBinxzQVXQEUFddDc HK36oSh7RxwY+oAPo9fGttOHKXkecXD/RJno8n8p5xxR8YBWnpTNKeKdxhSNynFkBbbZ GWjWXD2OXEPq/+W+KNEYGOdpY435SlLW2NsKe/+YHlJCRzBBomMssvafRfccibfuOUQS W2rTxcxf8dKQk8CT9fmFJPp9G2A81hSmZM8M8hVABes6wR5aoxD++qR0KkUUbdHwipY0 wxSuQ3JjDdZjkYL3GO3DjAr/DXE4hrxJXHNALA8a3FZzSxblHMTW1GvoScPuSUTOAZLQ t0oA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GFEIjBcKBcP6n40Ck7UabQV8Q30XprVDpg6Wcz7ABz0=; b=pos/2hhVyAOwE/CiHtNnB/KO1G8huXsZR/dJvv/N4SVXI6Ep93YFcI1Xx7z4Ek7C6L NVoN0XOFfgHVn2v7FJdWjabh9tCCd8hgrcNTi6NejXCLKLB6nxsJAZFBocUHfdP19O4K TzdEd8H+3SPT+vl/Au3YuxlFuI9pMKjzCIfpcWltt2HGW+J7/XnyMIsKcl8kBNNHR4IY 4EbV6h8MFhSXtvceKzpOUzLs08Ch8mpcM8IB6fo2ejx3ry3sQz+6AbpypDusNDpvrsln w1Axu2h7/bAgxK0xMtri5oiSj9fe3nkMvN/tVt4jTSDSXb0K19jQkubNbKkeyvyFmiYX jjtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJTG80TAhL2Y6sjuDionhqdvz4zLyoM06XIVeHEMHx7JgYk3IL yTQw6P40z4gXVqq6RyuVovH0xmIs66SN4zzOciU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNFfgVWpjA1Kwot4SU6voIpVcX1p0VhJgK6nzs7xAn8RLy+PufE38VKIirMMJqRWe0rTB8Z21WxLKFF1X5P8k=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:62d5:: with SMTP id w204mr525599oib.136.1572277248849; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFt6Bammns-K5Mb6LFiQ9yXyAWFe7b_YKdDWzcNbvwN5GPRHaw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFt6Bammns-K5Mb6LFiQ9yXyAWFe7b_YKdDWzcNbvwN5GPRHaw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:40:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jcR3Lz7o=ju-R11pOeL1qLCnfV+G5KmKN7M+pUcRzS0bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7fb950595fa52a9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/b3-AiaZzAVviEzkUiw5T_6ok7SQ>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] State of NFSv4 implementations ( who is active )
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:40:59 -0000

i suppose I should add that Netapp has an NFSv4 server implementation
supporting v3, v4.0, and v4.1 that is shipped and in use for in on-premises
environments and also available on Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, and perhaps
some others.   We are working on v4..2 but have not shipped any support.
 We are also working on RDMA suport for NFS. We do support pNFS file.

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:02 AM spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> As a working group and care taker of the proposed standards within our
> purview, I think it would be fruitful to have a collectively working group
> view of what implementations are in-market and which are under support only
> and which are under active development.
>
> As we work through various bis work, we need to understand whom to have
> contact with within the broader community, who is represented directly
> within the working group and which implementations are not.
>
> The other use of this knowledge is if, big if, our documents move from
> proposed standard, they will need implementation reports and this type of
> information will be helpful.
>
> If individuals can self report here for those organizations (or
> individuals - Hi, Rick!) that are active, etc., that would be great.  If
> there are implementations not represented here based on alias membership,
> please ask for permission and then post those activities as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Spencer
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email