IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Can we make delstid go into last call?

Thomas Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com> Thu, 08 September 2022 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <loghyr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0DAC1533AC for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qQIhexzb4imJ for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B26C1533AB for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 15:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id iw17so99529plb.0 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=zvIWz6i/ItcV0FdO6MfPbgMbgbN2Wplj7jr5frhd8o8=; b=CgRrKiyudn5BYFKgefJCWFEsy+DASIqICbON5NLPetbo3DqHIBUV6WfGsZHPMdPa3L PEkjVKjV6OHryFuYfz8c68pVNpf+bG2MnAsZbZa4pc/BZG3QtxARx4a0EJfFjXk/7rFc OtEhlBqElAt5sUOE2XT1+r4iiGln/RvbCsbkKTFDcLgEOvzvh1lHWQH6Krj8n2vRmc0o WwYH8cbcaVEXwuoEOEfluhSct31yqCYfCKHIRCdz40Ow7wHL8nQwbIPOCv5UZzj4ZVGH FKBmdNoqqfdLFmBfWPo6O+/4eE85BP/UnQ/AJaK9VKTa/FpxK+syusRtI1FyaeJsS24/ 7aLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=zvIWz6i/ItcV0FdO6MfPbgMbgbN2Wplj7jr5frhd8o8=; b=J7AJ0E6wfBOfkeqb7OOhpV7xf5xw0UdtvAPLRH0AI1Xxom0nPZFgZsR0bb5wPuKYuO 6G5wuiB18pYfu1LCbC6lVsTwGJSEkTiE56+S3tt9XskrrqE9KyxvDMOsSO1t97RWA2HC oG88W25oX3g17mnsaSUNlXzqiVk4qfB0kOB3MXuXaLCbc2Q//ZsXlOHMvHFFqy367o18 VXbGxS/8UgVSS4OVMtizGYAAUBNJE6PdmEdqcWsFZ5lKngmJsXJvWXWIHPgaL1clefqZ ar+58oKq1kQ9U4ivuUDlKjl0dH9Zc5Wg2FOCUMt2l1AUh+pJyrHREJ4C9Sxph1c4QwnW xmIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1EH8cC8B4DUFU/iMzxpMcBVsQsl3RxsZdWzMGLmjNRlBjmi21a 2UoaX2H5hVUyz39iQ1yOw4g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR41IT5IbYzfc3azkX41e8do8VOhvHO05nszJJGdz1nujFKBigwq5CRqdyz6c0W6JIoy4vYzAg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1d8b:b0:200:5367:5ecd with SMTP id pf11-20020a17090b1d8b00b0020053675ecdmr6360050pjb.165.1662675139422; Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-69-181-125-5.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [69.181.125.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n19-20020a170903405300b00174f62a14e5sm12025pla.153.2022.09.08.15.12.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <15993DC3-615F-456A-A045-C1D8813BDE0C@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8C235B28-746C-460B-95BF-FCEFCB394A93"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:12:17 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jexy810ZPeb2aCpsTbFcvo4JVanWrouuT7N0EJT1zac_A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
References: <0DA0BF46-3860-4FE5-A654-EC4D0240F356@gmail.com> <CADaq8jexy810ZPeb2aCpsTbFcvo4JVanWrouuT7N0EJT1zac_A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/bWAxQhpWD6RjD80lnqAdn-DKtP4>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Can we make delstid go into last call?
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 22:12:20 -0000


> On Sep 6, 2022, at 3:06 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I
> 
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 5:48 PM Thomas Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com <mailto:loghyr@gmail.com>> wrote:
> We decided at the last WG meeting to put the delstid document into WGLC.
> 
> 
> I didn't know that.  It was never mentioned on the list.
>  
> Can we start that process please?
> 
> I'd prefer to send you my review first (in about a week).   I think there are too many needed changes to deal with comfortably in the framework of WGLC. 


Waiting on the review then….

> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email