Re: [nfsv4] IETF 102 nfsv4 WG meeting go/no-go

 > Go/No-go went by us on Friday.

I had thought of Spencer's message as the as the Go/No-go (in this case Go).
My interpretation was that he requested a meeting based on his judgment
that there was a general feeling that we should meet.

> I haven't heard any objections to meeting,

Neither did  Spencer.

> and there does seem to be a substantive list of topics
> we could discuss.

We now have to turn that into a list of topics we will discuss and
divvy up the meeting time.

> We appear to have enough energy behind meeting
> in Montreal in July.

Yes. Now it's just a question of getting money, reservations, and plane
tickets,
and getting presentations ready.

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
wrote:

>
>
> > On May 11, 2018, at 3:42 PM, spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > As you will note, I have submitted a meeting request for IETF 102
> (Thanks for pushing the discussion this week, Chuck).
>
> Thank you for requesting the room!
>
> Go/No-go went by us on Friday. I haven't heard any objections to
> meeting, and there does seem to be a substantive list of topics
> we could discuss. We appear to have enough energy behind meeting
> in Montreal in July.
>
>
> > I wanted to get the meeting request in given the positive outlook and
> for the fact that hotel registration deadlines were approaching quickly.
> >
> > I can cancel the meeting request if there is a lack of interest but we
> should make that decision soon (Monday or Tuesday at the latest).
> >
> > Spencer
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
> spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Without expressing an opinion about when WGs meet and do not meet
> (that's a WG decision), it might be worth me mentioning that it's extremely
> unlikely I would object to a virtual interim meeting for any of my WGs, and
> the TSV ADs have a dedicated WebEx bridge ... so if you need to talk, but
> not badly enough to meet face to face, you still have options.
> >
> > Do the right thing, of course!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Spencer (D)
> >
> > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> wrote:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/important-dates/
> >
> > Says the cut-off for requesting a meeting room is June 1, 2018.
> >
> > I can think of a few agenda topics that are relevant at this time:
> >
> > - Tom/Trond have some virtualization-related extensions and other
> protocol fixups
> > - I can give a backgrounder on the Integrity Measurement work I'm doing
> > - Dave and I have the mv0 and mv1 trunking documents
> > - Any other 2018 milestones, such as the expired pNFS SCSI NVMe layout
> I-D
> > - RPC/RDMA credits: the road ahead
> >
> > That's not an exhaustive list, but it seems like critical mass already.
> > Any other thoughts?
> >
> > Can we set a go/no-go decision date, say Friday May 18th?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chuck Lever
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nfsv4 mailing list
> > nfsv4@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> >
> >
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>