Re: [nfsv4] [LNFS] Meeting Agenda for 05/12/2011 (new conference number)

On May 12, 2011, at 11:49 AM, jarrett.lu@oracle.com wrote:

> On 05/11/11 08:38 AM, Thomas Haynes wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On May 10, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>> + LFS Registry
>>>> Sorin has proposed that we pull this into the I-D, which will finally
>>>> consolidate all LFS documentation into one. I've done this.
>>> 
>>> There's probably interactions here with other parts of the IETF.
>>> Surely NFSv4 will not be the last protocol to have labels on the wire
>>> (it certainly isn't the first).  The registry mught need to be
>>> generic.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Good point, I agree.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Labeled IPsec has similar needs. 
> 
> The draft, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-quigley-label-format-registry-01 ,
> is intended to serve the needs. David Q. agreed to write a SELinux label
> format spec. Are there other things we should add to the draft?
> 

Where are we going to document PIs?

> - Jarrett
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4