Re: [nfsv4] comments w.r.t. flex layout draft 12

Thomas Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com> Mon, 24 July 2017 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <loghyr@primarydata.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C85131F05 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=primarydata.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufLR1ZISiAHv for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-194.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-194.mimecast.com [63.128.21.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DBB9131E97 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=PrimaryData.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-primarydata-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=CyjjNhVwwtyJbnpb5+sTzXPrmyLSXpQ3RfWn5uY3oiI=; b=hSjj6OQq4YEgKX+6JUMzxse9GIkzOucNYZAs+CVaHuR7PLb58mO7kSrl8JDiSpT0gozX8HergttKtNNV/EzqfP46F0+94AfisDl9STju+96Bf0hvBTl9beq/h4fEAshro/7l7TUxKrdX9Qcu4NlgYuY8+fQzCjQUMSOZ9JGNq9k=
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02lp0015.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.180.15]) (Using TLS) by us-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-50-OoWO8tlNM4K2dLpVs3akFA-1; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:32:31 -0400
Received: from BY2PR1101MB1093.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.164.166.21) by BY2PR1101MB1095.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.164.166.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1282.10; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:32:29 +0000
Received: from BY2PR1101MB1093.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.166.21]) by BY2PR1101MB1093.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.166.21]) with mapi id 15.01.1282.017; Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:32:29 +0000
From: Thomas Haynes <loghyr@primarydata.com>
To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
CC: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: comments w.r.t. flex layout draft 12
Thread-Index: AQHTAmkEOtZ5rSlip0aWin7YxO1ZKaJjg+GA
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:32:29 +0000
Message-ID: <303AC0E9-2C8B-476C-8E6F-6D3B31738130@primarydata.com>
References: <YTXPR01MB0189332A64D2E7485CFC8F2CDDA40@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <YTXPR01MB0189332A64D2E7485CFC8F2CDDA40@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [63.157.6.18]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR1101MB1095; 20:PA1euGskILQRbr2RdvMEmeBQsY3qG87biwueX3JN3neCd9K35mrgXL5I0yvUfHApc8gtMQIcV2AP6ysnFKzeR80XtiyaP+gLy0IwpSWUS8AOHxOAHa5Rlzy7lbV4qFq6yzfYVSssIr5/8K14bn8v29rETb7KfbGPFINn6izNZhM=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0f484ed9-b7bd-4e5e-5af8-08d4d2db7ca2
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254075)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:BY2PR1101MB1095;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY2PR1101MB1095:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(192374486261705);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR1101MB1095530E5808336D90032174CEBB0@BY2PR1101MB1095.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703101)(100105400095)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(2016111802025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(6072148)(6043046)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BY2PR1101MB1095; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BY2PR1101MB1095;
x-forefront-prvs: 0378F1E47A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39830400002)(39450400003)(199003)(377454003)(24454002)(189002)(2950100002)(6916009)(478600001)(6506006)(86362001)(81156014)(33656002)(105586002)(66066001)(106356001)(102836003)(8936002)(6486002)(25786009)(7736002)(6116002)(3846002)(81166006)(8676002)(305945005)(4326008)(229853002)(68736007)(77096006)(6436002)(5660300001)(36756003)(6246003)(14454004)(6512007)(99286003)(38730400002)(110136004)(53546010)(2900100001)(3280700002)(83716003)(82746002)(97736004)(101416001)(189998001)(3660700001)(2906002)(53936002)(54356999)(50986999)(76176999)(42262002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR1101MB1095; H:BY2PR1101MB1093.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-ID: <FB92E8AA46BDEA49B4AD61437B6F8EB5@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: primarydata.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jul 2017 21:32:29.5361 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 03193ed6-8726-4bb3-a832-18ab0d28adb7
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR1101MB1095
X-MC-Unique: OoWO8tlNM4K2dLpVs3akFA-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/facBPEtihI5r1A4qAXg0HUQo7PE>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] comments w.r.t. flex layout draft 12
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:32:36 -0000

> On Jul 21, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Overall, it looks good to me.
> 
> First off, there is one generic issue I thought I'd bring up...
> - w.r.t. Kerberos...shouldn't it be talking about Rpcsec_gss instead of Kerberos,
>  just in case someone uses another security mechanism someday?
> - Also, I'll admit I didn't understand the last two sentences of Sec. 15.1.1.
> - Why is the metadata server generating TGTs. Is this referring to the case of
>   the metadata doing I/O on the storage server? Or is this specific to some part of
>   RPCSEC_GSS_V3 (which I'll admit I've never looked at;-). If the latter, just ignore
>   my ignorance;-)

Just pointing that I’ll deal with this in the context of the emails from Ben and Olga.

And I’ll address the nits in my next editorial round.

Thanks for taking the time to do the review!