[nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5665 (2015)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 26 January 2010 12:18 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C2E3A689A for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:18:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Lq80qPH9Tp5 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EBF3A6827 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 28302E06A7; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:18:54 -0800 (PST)
To: mike@eisler.com, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, lars.eggert@nokia.com, beepy@netapp.com, shepler@storspeed.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100126121854.28302E06A7@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:18:54 -0800
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5665 (2015)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:18:44 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5665, "IANA Considerations for Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Network Identifiers and Universal Address Formats". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5665&eid=2015 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 5.1, pg.6 Original Text ------------- [[ Item 4., last paragraph ]] For assignments made on a Standards Action basis, the point of | contact is always determined by IESG. ^ Corrected Text -------------- For assignments made on a Standards Action basis, the point of | contact is always determined by the IESG. Notes ----- Rationale: missing article; consistency of style. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5665 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-netid-06) -------------------------------------- Title : IANA Considerations for Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Network Identifiers and Universal Address Formats Publication Date : January 2010 Author(s) : M. Eisler Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network File System Version 4 Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5665 (2015) RFC Errata System