IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] rfc5667bis open issues

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Wed, 28 September 2016 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4581612B1C7 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjzjvtIbElh1 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 247F112B1B1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u8SFMaq4019093 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:22:36 GMT
Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u8SFMZjR022631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:22:36 GMT
Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8SFMZ7h028084; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:22:35 GMT
Received: from [172.21.13.30] (/63.73.225.227) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:22:35 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jfVDVWcqu2tHBG7dvFDHRo7HGqUANthP4hQp9UwiyZBVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:22:34 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <58BB0EB5-7463-4261-8282-A2B8ABD7089A@oracle.com>
References: <15F62327-B73F-45CF-B4A5-8535955E954F@oracle.com> <65E80EDE-6031-4A83-9B73-3A88C91F8E6A@oracle.com> <CADaq8jc50Ca6eDZ3D6zRvfG+Q2DngNN6+mN9WKXj9AS=d1iQVg@mail.gmail.com> <D0ECCDF7-F785-4419-AA93-33B2054C4737@oracle.com> <CADaq8jcSxc6BQKJ1SZ=OrpRcEGpgpfdLDcPpBp=GfGQJwkbLEw@mail.gmail.com> <11DB3812-B605-4426-A316-176CE31910B2@oracle.com> <CADaq8jfVDVWcqu2tHBG7dvFDHRo7HGqUANthP4hQp9UwiyZBVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/hTviuOUhH3k-3ih3WXQSHkkR3Cs>
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] rfc5667bis open issues
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:22:42 -0000

> On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:39 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > As far as the session case, the server will consider the request executed but the client does not have a reply containing the slot and sequence.  To deal with that case, he would have to use rdma_xid in the message with the ERR_CHUNK to get the needed context and so conclude that the slot was available for reuse.
> 
> > This feels like something that belongs in 5667bis. I'm no real
> > expert on session behavior. Can you sketch some text that can be added?
> 
> I'll write it assuming it will constitute a new subsection 4.x dealing with session-related issues.

Thanks, that sounds appropriate. I'll hold the next document
revision until you send me text.


--
Chuck Lever

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email