IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-09.txt

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 18 September 2020 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54BC3A0832; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 06:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7STRHU3gblgA; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 06:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E77393A0400; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 06:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 08ID2L7T006065; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:02:22 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu 08ID2L7T006065
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1600434142; bh=xZytF+AWkRKwj4YOatrx005jxs1xcK/CNUZ1cmH0vSE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Vf6FJJtqSk5kl3O3BUo+64pId9KvVrLx4j55tor/ZUpbE2ZJO8fnrwCFYAAYHifH3 EGeUU+rP9c8pUYKsZuXgM8hRt3I8GZRtPvsSbueDWVeUYP2lRdGbG5gWBhylnIdoP9 WbEM4KGpWZVo/5WuN1rgYJhiaB/b7+q7Px/JTXTQ=
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (morris.ad.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.46]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 08ID2KZc013679; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:02:20 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:02:19 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.003; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:02:19 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls@ietf.org>, nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-09.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWjbdEmBGrom01Q06elL5Walc48qluW/7g
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:02:18 +0000
Message-ID: <ffea5d3f86424b18a4d201a4e9f70521@cert.org>
References: <160043176990.4266.7928980658167662361@ietfa.amsl.com> <FAFC1684-7142-4D68-BA85-EAEF7D206907@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <FAFC1684-7142-4D68-BA85-EAEF7D206907@oracle.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.201.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/j5RAhLEvnKIyoat3PuNwknyciFM>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-09.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:02:29 -0000

Hi Chuck!

Thank you for merging the changes in -09.  (As previously discussed) This text addresses my DISCUSS and COMMENT feedback.  I've cleared my ballot.

Regards,
Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 8:29 AM
> To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>; Roman Danyliw
> <rdd@cert.org>; Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
> Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls@ietf.org; nfsv4-chairs
> <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>; NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
> Subject: Fwd: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-09.txt
> 
> Hello-
> 
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-09.txt
> > Date: September 18, 2020 at 8:22:49 AM EDT
> > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> > Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
> > Reply-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 WG of the IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : Towards Remote Procedure Call Encryption By Default
> >        Authors         : Trond Myklebust
> >                          Charles Lever
> > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-09.txt
> > 	Pages           : 26
> > 	Date            : 2020-09-18
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document describes a mechanism that, through the use of
> >   opportunistic Transport Layer Security (TLS), enables encryption of
> >   Remote Procedure Call (RPC) transactions while they are in-transit.
> >   The proposed mechanism interoperates with ONC RPC implementations
> >   that do not support it.  This document updates RFC 5531.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls/
> >
> > There is also a HTML versions available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-09.html
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-09
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> This revision contains proposed updates to address the many DISCUSS and
> COMMENT ballot positions offered during IESG review. Magnus suggested that
> I provide a fresh revision as the easiest vehicle to explore these updates, and
> we can go forward from here with any additional changes needed.
> 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email