IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] WG last call for Registry Specification for MAC Security Label Formats

Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com> Thu, 18 September 2014 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sshepler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D606C1A0110 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22gbkg0cRqkl for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0736.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:736]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E723A1A8A60 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BL2PR03MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.89.12) by BL2PR03MB370.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.89.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1029.13; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:54:01 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.89.12]) by BL2PR03MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.89.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1029.000; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:54:01 +0000
From: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
To: Tom Haynes <thomas.haynes@primarydata.com>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] WG last call for Registry Specification for MAC Security Label Formats
Thread-Index: Ac+9dm6kH3o0wytIShWB9U5NsYKw4AWJC0yAAABIqTA=
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:54:01 +0000
Message-ID: <1aab9e5cf60d4da6896b02e8083a0836@BL2PR03MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <6a23f9a4e7e6476590b2ad33b62cd726@BL2PR03MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <32CBBE08-8FE2-4950-B29C-DF8BD3121E87@primarydata.com>
In-Reply-To: <32CBBE08-8FE2-4950-B29C-DF8BD3121E87@primarydata.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [199.255.45.10]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 033857D0BD
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(164054003)(377454003)(97736003)(81542003)(74662003)(77982003)(81342003)(79102003)(4396001)(76176999)(106356001)(15975445006)(74502003)(19300405004)(46102003)(108616004)(19609705001)(2656002)(16236675004)(66066001)(20776003)(15202345003)(31966008)(76482002)(21056001)(86362001)(95666004)(19580395003)(19617315012)(54356999)(85306004)(83072002)(92566001)(19625215002)(50986999)(110136001)(86612001)(83322001)(99286002)(19580405001)(85852003)(105586002)(107046002)(80022003)(64706001)(33646002)(74316001)(76576001)(99396002)(90102001)(101416001)(87936001)(24736002)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB370; H:BL2PR03MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sshepler@microsoft.com;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1aab9e5cf60d4da6896b02e8083a0836BL2PR03MB369namprd03pro_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/jBQUyf4JcSAXQvQDIUdmU-szGwY
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] WG last call for Registry Specification for MAC Security Label Formats
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:54:29 -0000

Yes, Agreed that LC is complete and the existing I-D will move to shepherd write-up and then IESG submission.

Spencer

From: Tom Haynes [mailto:thomas.haynes@primarydata.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 4:45 PM
To: Spencer Shepler
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] WG last call for Registry Specification for MAC Security Label Formats


On Aug 21, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com<mailto:sshepler@microsoft.com>> wrote:



Hi.  We are starting a working group last call for the following WG I-D....

Registry Specification for Mandatory Access Control (MAC) Security Label Formats (draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-00.txt)

The I-D in your favorite format can be found here:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry/

Please review and provide comments to the authors and the WG alias.

The last call will run from today through Sept 12th.


Spencer
_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org<mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4


Hi Spencer,

We've addressed all of the issues raised and pushed out a new version of the draft.

Can we declare LC over and move on to the next step, which I think is sending this out to the IESG for review?

Thanks,
Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email