Re: [nfsv4] xattr questions
Manoj Naik <manoj.naik@nutanix.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 18:28 UTC
Return-Path: <manoj.naik@nutanix.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AB81294B4 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:28:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nutanix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id naEwH3kJagZ6 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:28:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02on0118.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.36.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0433D12948F for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:28:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nutanix.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=ZOzDUVOrX75/EZN3svp1QhOePDcocJMLiu3v3iBU4NU=; b=sMsRreSPP9lZA7MGoArISzNTRhoCVzZnaf/NgxvwBoDYqdQdSSRUV8D7p6T+GpFCKEJuMesDw1XPevgiJNoApRxMalX7g62Prdxy13UwqIk92/DGyNCxfIDVd8CQTr/nSPQfsOSDtSmL0TKBVOt4rlaZNclT18wFiESooiW8HiQ=
Received: from DM5PR02MB2617.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.168.196.7) by DM5PR02MB2617.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.168.196.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.919.13; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:28:54 +0000
Received: from DM5PR02MB2617.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.196.7]) by DM5PR02MB2617.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.196.7]) with mapi id 15.01.0919.018; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:28:54 +0000
From: Manoj Naik <manoj.naik@nutanix.com>
To: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] xattr questions
Thread-Index: AQHSjGNu7ZJg9bKjwEu8vrhydTVTCaFzQdMA
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:28:54 +0000
Message-ID: <6D83629C-32B8-44B2-9499-04443CB6C3D3@nutanix.com>
References: <20170221165606.GA32024@fieldses.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170221165606.GA32024@fieldses.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: fieldses.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;fieldses.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nutanix.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [173.227.38.2]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7b3ffebf-226d-40c6-5db2-08d45a877e0a
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:DM5PR02MB2617;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR02MB2617; 7:cHRJMOrbTx+9MtfdAn8YsNbj+iybnB0aIfP+XuBCQ9PSI79b9vYONXztCdgyXqtm6nmxQYwByPBQ2w5x+e6S89tLjtDk2mNeMivo4v8K1Qu0/0jeO1PpBFO2lcRQB+xz3FStRl/t3gMgd4Os+5p5pdVPR/f1rboNMIAyz2CgiqR1P8rAAT2oADiwuna5LZhfeH0Ao01jeLzkmuH/KzrPmOYNZprfr/WMT9BHB0kZxisclPrBxdYtIjLOzP6gJMjVstdkwmrnu1Jd4qkEQLlRsemB4d5h1Pg0HTFP2Z7E+3gz6vw/tHYdhZ8gNgfrTF1SHAynPX1/eMnEFrjMlJ1zuA==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR02MB2617DE6CC6E4E8707A60E20C80510@DM5PR02MB2617.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(274839183919467)(104084551191319);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123558025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:DM5PR02MB2617; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR02MB2617;
x-forefront-prvs: 0225B0D5BC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39450400003)(24454002)(377454003)(8676002)(81166006)(6486002)(6916009)(8936002)(2950100002)(4326007)(92566002)(106116001)(2900100001)(8656002)(33656002)(82746002)(77096006)(6436002)(6506006)(25786008)(229853002)(83716003)(99286003)(5660300001)(66066001)(50986999)(102836003)(189998001)(53936002)(76176999)(3846002)(54906002)(6116002)(54356999)(122556002)(7736002)(86362001)(110136004)(2906002)(3660700001)(36756003)(3280700002)(305945005)(6306002)(6246003)(6512007)(38730400002)(53546006)(64030200001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR02MB2617; H:DM5PR02MB2617.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <929BD51B4891EB4BBD556828E141A87C@namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nutanix.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Feb 2017 18:28:54.5894 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bb047546-786f-4de1-bd75-24e5b6f79043
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR02MB2617
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/lezFItLOhC1oN6c8leuvX47zimI>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] xattr questions
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:28:59 -0000
The source is nroff. Not sure how good the conversion to XML will be, but if it’s useful, I can send it directly to you. Manoj. On 2/21/17, 8:56 AM, "nfsv4 on behalf of Bruce Fields" <nfsv4-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bfields@fieldses.org> wrote: Do you have XML source for the xattr draft someplace? (I was considering whether to take some of the XDR-related boilerplate.) Also: where's the latest linux xattr code? Are you planning to submit it again soon? I can't recall seeing it recently. --b. On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 05:09:37PM -0700, Marc Eshel wrote: > update Manoj email. > > > > From: Marc Eshel/Almaden/IBM > To: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> > Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>, Manoj Naik > <mnaik@us.ibm.com> > Date: 08/21/2016 05:05 PM > Subject: Re: draft-naik-nfsv4-xattrs > > > I think we should have a consistent way of discovering if a feature is > supported or not and for now continue to use the fattr flags to indicate > support. > I don't care if it is 81 or 82. Manoj? > Marc. > > > > > From: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> > To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> > Cc: Manoj Naik <mnaik@us.ibm.com>, Marc Eshel/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > Date: 08/17/2016 12:33 PM > Subject: Re: draft-naik-nfsv4-xattrs > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:32:22PM -0400, Bruce Fields wrote: > > One minor detail on draft-ietf-nfsv4-xattrs: fattr4_xattr_support seems > > unnecessary, as you'll discover the lack of support the first time you > > try to use one of the new operations. > > > > Could we remove it? > > (Also, a minor consideration, but: with that removed there's no conflict > at all between the umask and xattr specs. But obviously if you really > need it, we could flip a coin to decide who gets attribute number 81 and > who moves to 82.) > > --b. > > > > > _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
- Re: [nfsv4] xattr questions Bruce Fields
- [nfsv4] xattr questions Bruce Fields
- Re: [nfsv4] xattr questions spencer shepler
- Re: [nfsv4] xattr questions Manoj Naik
- Re: [nfsv4] xattr questions Manoj Naik