IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Planning for FedFS last calls

James Lentini <jlentini@netapp.com> Fri, 01 October 2010 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jlentini@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD063A6DCE for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.823
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.823 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.776, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UdPwvvvkM0ih for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DBF3A6CD1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,267,1283756400"; d="scan'208";a="461486914"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2010 11:07:03 -0700
Received: from jlentini-linux.hq.netapp.com (jlentini-linux.hq.netapp.com [10.97.16.21]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id o91I72rE023598; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:07:02 -0400
From: James Lentini <jlentini@netapp.com>
X-X-Sender: jlentini@jlentini-linux.nane.netapp.com
To: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <E043D9D8EE3B5743B8B174A814FD584F0A64D44A@TK5EX14MBXC124.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010011358390.21841@jlentini-linux.nane.netapp.com>
References: <E043D9D8EE3B5743B8B174A814FD584F0A64D44A@TK5EX14MBXC124.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Planning for FedFS last calls
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:06:15 -0000

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Spencer Shepler wrote:

> 
> Thanks for the input on the FedFS last calls.  Given that,
> this is what I propose for a timeline.
> 
> Last call for
> " NSDB Protocol for Federated Filesystems"
> draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-09
> 
> will start on Oct 4th and end on Oct 22nd.

Sounds good.

> 
> Last call for
> "Administration Protocol for Federated Filesystems"
> draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-admin-07 (?)
> 
> will start on Oct 11th and end on Nov 5th.

That should work. I'll give a warning if -07 will not be ready in 
time.

> 
> If there is a desire to change dates/durations, etc., that is
> fine with me -- just wanted to give everyone a heads up
> so they can plan around the schedule.
> 
> Spencer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email