[nfsv4] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-03: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 22 May 2017 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213D112741D; Mon, 22 May 2017 11:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask@ietf.org, Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, spencer.shepler@gmail.com, nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.51.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149547882504.14094.5234280350076129319.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 11:47:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/n_UwgcV5idqevAZD9J6BSNw0SG8>
Subject: [nfsv4] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 18:47:05 -0000

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-umask/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Alexey - an example would be helpful.
As someone who has run into this issue (and differences in behavior!),
this is a useful document.


Nits:
Abstract:
"In many important environments, inheritable NFSv4 ACLs can be
   rendered ineffective by the application of the per-process umask."
s/important//
1: (personal peeve) - every environment is important to someone...
2: this makes it sound like inheritable ACLs would NOT be ineffective if
the environment is not important :-)


Sec 2.  Problem Statement
"As a result, inherited ACEs describing"....
First use of ACE, please expand / reference.