Re: [nfsv4] [FedFS] What LDAP directory implementation have folks been using for the NSDB thus far?
James Lentini <jlentini@netapp.com> Mon, 14 December 2009 23:07 UTC
Return-Path: <jlentini@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7BF3A6887 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:07:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdsB5ZQZq7Yw for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:07:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165343A686E for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:07:46 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,397,1257148800"; d="scan'208";a="288287614"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2009 15:07:33 -0800
Received: from jlentini-linux.hq.netapp.com (jlentini-linux.hq.netapp.com [10.97.16.21]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id nBEN7WJL015175; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:07:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:07:32 -0500
From: James Lentini <jlentini@netapp.com>
X-X-Sender: jlentini@jlentini-linux.nane.netapp.com
To: stacey_chris@emc.com
In-Reply-To: <0F3F903BA6B4A54984787888AF6EA5C4046728F7@CORPUSMX40A.corp.emc.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912141801460.18058@jlentini-linux.nane.netapp.com>
References: <0F3F903BA6B4A54984787888AF6EA5C4046728F7@CORPUSMX40A.corp.emc.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1628050704-1170418118-1260832052=:18058"
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] [FedFS] What LDAP directory implementation have folks been using for the NSDB thus far?
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:07:47 -0000
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, stacey_chris@emc.com wrote: > Just curious – what LDAP directory implementation you been using for > the NSDB in a FedFS setup thus far? Any issues? Good points? Hi Chris, We tested OpenLDAP and OpenDS at the NFS Bake-a-thon. I've also done some experimenting with Apache DS, Fedora 389, and Active Directory in LDS mode. There are instructions on how to setup OpenLDAP as an NSDB in the SNSDB SourceForge project's documentation. -james
- [nfsv4] [FedFS] What LDAP directory implementatio… stacey_chris
- Re: [nfsv4] [FedFS] What LDAP directory implement… James Lentini
- Re: [nfsv4] [FedFS] What LDAP directory implement… stacey_chris