Re: [nfsv4] FW: New Version Notification for draft-faibish-nfsv4-pnfs-block-disk-protection-01.txt

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 07 July 2011 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C510921F87AC for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.241
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.241 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.264, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tF0iYPhGfVHy for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C8121F8797 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB2F768058 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=Jo2452JVdr3hSeroEhhvORH39EjiVH6zNn0fHYh2xcmi /GoO/vD3hs6N7o5+mAY10gaxnXdEY50aX1EucpSxVYXb2Nt/BbXnr7+BKk+7BsE9 2EswYs9tWW8V0EWsUdw3OgTtCKaPuzDkOtwel0SmYiiEPYVhXFrtop8R84lBDOY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=5o52RY/DfSajWBFU25mFlq4+rtc=; b=jYjQF7g39sc YezPS//LN7eDsu+3UqXeAfHIPfOvdOe1F2hEwgTRza/FhH7LfK86XXhUnf3A+9fj 8kYKR31cSzqUJazghxXWmUNnaBOaNntKoJeQktkBI5RAxLLsMVwqQ3WKjj/D+amz 5RJa2SVBJ0z79UUADG/6B8bjoPWA00FQ=
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85F19768056 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so636646gwb.31 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.200.1 with SMTP id x1mr1357097agf.58.1310069645004; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.91.143.11 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110707170428.GA26714@merit.edu>
References: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E0589392870@MX14A.corp.emc.com> <4E15C1B5.5070600@tonian.com> <op.vx8679iyunckof@usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com> <1746881557-1310051155-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-585899366-@b27.c3.bise3.blackberry> <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E0589392A9A@MX14A.corp.emc.com> <4E15E259.2090208@tonian.com> <20110707170428.GA26714@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:14:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOjPEe5rBzzLLcVgq_zqUftiV3YFPXPk-weGBBe=uBUy+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] FW: New Version Notification for draft-faibish-nfsv4-pnfs-block-disk-protection-01.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:14:06 -0000

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu> wrote:
> Benny Halevy wrote:
>  On 2011-07-07 19:34, david.black@emc.com wrote:
>  > What's the problem with use of GPT?
>
>  There is no formal standard for it as far as I see
>
> Isn't it part of UEFI?  Which may be problematical if it requires a license,
> but would still be a published standard.

Standards-Track RFCs can (and many do) have normative references to
non-Internet standards, even non-free standards (ASN.1 specs used to
be non-free in the sense that one had to pay to get a copy).

Nico
--