Re: [nfsv4] Fwd: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-14: (with COMMENT)
Robert Thurlow <robert.thurlow@oracle.com> Wed, 28 November 2012 23:49 UTC
Return-Path: <robert.thurlow@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086EE21F890A for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:49:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BrjgomL4fHY4 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C4121F8907 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qASNnojn018517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:49:50 GMT
Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qASNnnJh012562 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:49:49 GMT
Received: from abhmt102.oracle.com (abhmt102.oracle.com [141.146.116.54]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qASNnnXj031445; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:49:49 -0600
Received: from [10.159.126.66] (/10.159.126.66) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:49:48 -0800
Message-ID: <50B6A31C.3080806@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:49:48 -0700
From: Robert Thurlow <robert.thurlow@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
References: <20121128094917.25354.35650.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <724A6781-D8A3-4AA9-8E9B-E12279DBF41C@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <724A6781-D8A3-4AA9-8E9B-E12279DBF41C@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
Cc: NFSv4 on Linux mailing list <nfsv4@ietf.org>, Andy Adamson <William.Adamson@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Fwd: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-protocol-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:49:53 -0000
On 11/28/12 04:18 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > Looking back at the private e-mail thread at the end of July 2012 that culminates here: > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg11248.html > > I don't see that we excluded on purpose a requirement to implement (but not use) TLS for NSDB connections. Should we add a requirement to implement? I could tolerate "mandatory to implement". I wonder if this would be a hardship for anyone, since standard client libraries seem pretty solid here. Rob T
- [nfsv4] Fwd: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Chuck Lever
- Re: [nfsv4] Fwd: Stephen Farrell's No Objection o… Robert Thurlow