[nfsv4] Setting up interim meetings

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7B03A0DAA; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nbG5PWWR0Own; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E38AF3A0DA4; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id c21so3753911edt.1; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RQXBvEkK/WDTLMaTetTm5cQDv2RozbwyU2tYtjxvjl4=; b=AL4fEZw9lhrA2WguTxIZ46bom9vPzixq0KVQaK0YAASIVrGAhWAoyoCkfumsH0y/9N L08txGsOq78Wkhxsc45lsoKhlO+1Smq5XwMikEKyYd4Ijo4Xp19M9aHcragwi964DeA5 H7WOEqA5XpZc5mPHNFfDx4oaCqqzaHtWyyiL1yYHVGetUcg+y9IfivCUiDW2UQRAemCp eX21fOzJ4yhs69mxrrEGtVijONxkEzWppG4lDGtGcpJBrT83qfu7ibn3XMBIoDEHuXYj VsO/BFw7owbhduT86Jx/a3mxEBEQiHHtKJJVnp21mZ9GdIuiAEbXIcUY1nnGhyD/QTpV ModQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RQXBvEkK/WDTLMaTetTm5cQDv2RozbwyU2tYtjxvjl4=; b=lLe3MGP2vifMVwl7TWx56VM9uJi9VFBydHnlxK3j/QW2zVgsAsmD9t7aYLiJfpyP3E kqLjeGEfnH0BdrCK5hpCB4HQwtUEJwHb6VOWp1D42jB59YjhyZM7oaMv2AnrvwZfqqae i/Dh7YDI8qIIANDZMNmuXM2XOPXhSXfQeWXQMhTc+BdzzYtfiQiMDbwNgmrr/pvxdJHn Cc4KRC551uENFVUkXqJFK4dp8B6wBnyQcwQbREk+KU/h1J5LPvhrY2PRzTynZYAzJs3h YVlqVY6qcOGiaNimSnvK1CSENmm9Gyk1sNmrgvMA71LzlB0Dww1AymSmeYLImtcqqXhs iAVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0M19ZHgzSVNqC0qb3URzgZ1Sxj2+MJiu9RPoQgr5LzNHE7qP0S vRYszdVbMdsVwui8FCIGHCRoXMXJSQ1az49IoGZ+fQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv6vDYL24gW1BClDsOCPrcYNLvGcax9PhmBKXi3sTD74HZGmqslUUrEX/IUyDyWJZnd3xp9BduBjsO+w5Cx71A=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1e56:: with SMTP id i22mr3101586ejj.314.1583945838976; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:57:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jfDWphx4ROo-eYMTXG4MST_bKgdpn4aZgR--54SCWT7pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Cc: nfsv4-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000013639d05a09721a5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/q6yE--IRlV6sa8RyOA-7-kraPrQ>
Subject: [nfsv4] Setting up interim meetings
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:57:50 -0000

We need to decide on times to hold interim meetings to compensate for the
cancellation of on-site meetings in Vanvouver.    The model I'm thinking of
is two webex meetings, one corresponding to each of the NFSv4 working group
sessions.   To make things easier for people to remeber, it would be best
if the two meetings happen at the same time in successive weeks.   I'm OK
with 10AM-noon Pacific.  Is this too early for some people in the Eastern
time zone?  Also, are there people outside North America that we need to
accommodate?

I think that the agendas we use will be based on the ones already published
for the on-site meeting.   Please let me know of any corrections.   For the
new work session, which will be later, there may be an opportunity to add
material although I expect the agenda to be fixed one week before the
meeting.