[nfsv4] FW: New Version Notification for draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-00.txt
"Haynes, Tom" <Tom.Haynes@netapp.com> Fri, 14 March 2014 05:14 UTC
Return-Path: <Tom.Haynes@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D5E1A0039 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9rO5uDQDvCRW for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx11.netapp.com (mx11.netapp.com [216.240.18.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D54C1A0035 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,652,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="109196497"
Received: from vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.35]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2014 22:14:04 -0700
Received: from SACEXCMBX05-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.8.249]) by vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:14:04 -0700
From: "Haynes, Tom" <Tom.Haynes@netapp.com>
To: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPP0NOm3U0gPvZeUuQx38VGZx9q5rgCeYA
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:14:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CF47DD73.50978%thomas@netapp.com>
References: <20140314050725.7247.90923.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140314050725.7247.90923.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.122.105.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <D7732A5054776B40BC0877672E20C31F@hq.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/sXPcwDuFGZlgXzG2kU3s1yfsExU
Subject: [nfsv4] FW: New Version Notification for draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-00.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:14:13 -0000
When we had the slew of new layout type proposals in Atlanta, I said I¹d draft an informational RFC on what I thought were the differences between the Layout Type requirements and the File Layout Type in RFC 5661. This is that document. My knowledge of the Blocks and Objects is strictly a reading one, so I¹d appreciate feedback from the people who actually implemented servers for them. On 3/13/14, 10:07 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-00.txt >has been successfully submitted by Thomas Haynes and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types >Revision: 00 >Title: Considerations for a new pNFS Layout Type >Document date: 2014-03-13 >Group: Individual Submission >Pages: 10 >URL: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-00.txt >Status: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types/ >Htmlized: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-haynes-nfsv4-layout-types-00 > > >Abstract: > This document provides guidelines for identifying the fine line > between the requirements for Network File System (NFS) version 4.1's > Parallel NFS (pNFS) and those for the pNFS File Layout. Implementors > trying to specify new Layout Types are having difficulty in > separating the two sets of requirements. > > > > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat >