[nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6611)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 16 June 2021 08:26 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DCB3A0818 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RW1ZnBZHxqx4 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333E53A0812 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 29D31F4079E; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnoveck@netapp.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, beepee@gmail.com, davenoveck@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: seman.shen@emc.com, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210616082529.29D31F4079E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:25:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/snlcDQhE_42HELEMR65MayWFdAQ>
Subject: [nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6611)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:26:13 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8881, "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6611 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Seman.Shen <seman.shen@emc.com> Section: 18.37.3 Original Text ------------- * Otherwise, the error CB_BACK_CHAN_BUSY SHOULD be returned to indicate that there are CB_COMPOUNDs that need to be replied to. Corrected Text -------------- * Otherwise, the error NFS4ERR_BACK_CHAN_BUSY SHOULD be returned to indicate that there are CB_COMPOUNDs that need to be replied to. Notes ----- CB_BACK_CHAN_BUSY is not defined in this document. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8881 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol Publication Date : August 2020 Author(s) : D. Noveck, Ed., C. Lever Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network File System Version 4 Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [nfsv4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6611) RFC Errata System