IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on charter-ietf-nfsv4-06-00: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 17 July 2020 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6958C3A0B30; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5bbxkPsUL-m; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067843A0B2E; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 06HNOmfG022031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:24:50 -0400
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:24:47 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, nfsv4@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200717232447.GH41010@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <159486665577.29287.9944168393822130570@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADaq8jewtUd+Qp0Q4wYV=0uxN=-+BmWWaGOJnOz2eCg1kTksWg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jewtUd+Qp0Q4wYV=0uxN=-+BmWWaGOJnOz2eCg1kTksWg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/tLSYQ6ejwLmNTFTWRKYtgkgfmtk>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on charter-ietf-nfsv4-06-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 23:24:56 -0000

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:02:53PM -0400, David Noveck wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020, 10:30 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > What's the current status of the NVMe+pNFS SCSI layout and RPC-over-RDMAv2
> > milestones
> 
[...]
> > (that are disappearing with this change)?
> >
> 
> Any disappearance is likely to be the result of a slip-up, rather than a
> magic trick. Previous charter iterations did not include milestones and I
> believe Magnus' inclusion of a new milestone for the rdma extensions was
> not meant to imply that others not included had been eliminated.

Ah, understood.

Thanks for the clarification,

Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email