Re: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5661 (5040)

[Megan Ferguson <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jonathan,

We have updated the corrected text to use DESTROY_CLIENTID.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf

On Jun 12, 2017, at 10:56 AM, Price, Jonathan <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Errata to  my errata - mea culpa:
> 
> It should be "DESTROY_CLIENTID", not "DESTROY_CLIENT_ID" as I have in my errata submission.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noveck, David [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:49 PM
> To: RFC Errata System; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: Price, Jonathan; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5661 (5040)
> 
> Should be verified.  Leaving out DESTROY_CLIENT_ID in 18.46.13 was an oversight.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:29 PM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Noveck, David <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5661 (5040)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5661, "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5040
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Jonathan Price <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 18.46.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Operations other than SEQUENCE, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, EXCHANGE_ID, CREATE_SESSION, and DESTROY_SESSION, MUST NOT appear as the first operation in a COMPOUND.  
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Operations other than SEQUENCE, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, EXCHANGE_ID, DESTROY_CLIENT_ID, CREATE_SESSION, and DESTROY_SESSION, MUST NOT appear as the first operation in a COMPOUND.  
> 
> Notes
> -----
> In the section for DESTROY_CLIENTID (18.50.3), the following text exists (see snipped section below).
> This means that DESTROY_CLIENTID must also be in the list for operations that are allowed in the first operation of a compound.
> 
> <...snip...>
>   If DESTROY_CLIENTID is not prefixed by SEQUENCE, it MUST be the only
>   operation in the COMPOUND request (otherwise, the server MUST return
>   NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP).  If the operation is sent without a SEQUENCE
>   preceding it, a client that retransmits the request may receive an
>   error in response, because the original request might have been
>   successfully executed.
> <...snip...>
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5661 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-29)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol
> Publication Date    : January 2010
> Author(s)           : S. Shepler, Ed., M. Eisler, Ed., D. Noveck, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network File System Version 4
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG