IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Thu, 03 January 2019 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AC1130EAA; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 07:50:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TG_WDqvIh4hT; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 07:50:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C378F130EA1; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 07:50:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id w25so29647739otm.13; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 07:50:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Cc40tSc06ErNrb2GglZZOW0+gmdjzKZ3yrBzQj3otyg=; b=kU/2zaVAXGwnmr8I2q1nOETykX0UtQBTQS7nR7C2VYkB/5sAFLUnXqxryPRS9cURq9 kWT4XHggnrthBzfkFdR47JLC7UHnsN7mBzgtxKKVHuspMSO50u4+nxnOFW96T4rdujYg mNVLWmWVq3mCcNKu/KS645ZAClTfEBZNLD+XbG4dktyPA4M4IBNg7PNJI3RdoLl2trT1 SIuUeVDT/p05yByCrvDL+ahHWTe9mMv9Tc2dGlWDtqItzAsbDZ6dl9pJoTJVSdNcO2mL cA+pA6l6ZAehJIdxcm46uKXMBB1C8ZYcoEJJHq4nWsgOZ2/yGm/oWrTAjDCw6fI7DrWR cVkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Cc40tSc06ErNrb2GglZZOW0+gmdjzKZ3yrBzQj3otyg=; b=aUxxbU8njorFFC03HSbM7LB/Ho5oTVrGwplFcTlb9ldQCga9TdK2XW3c2XPJi1kETF U6c3c+bDRF0cSmcupQMt3/03XwB0ihbmPeYnFMXqq25tVey8jgvefKISaZrwTKNrM5Yq h8pqK7fZnGPgm1SaLm3uNoJJAGQxvSl/KHGD7aNMcVqr7wnvISRfTXhR0uGhbs7nEQCx 9NxQOyw2EQFABBE3fX9nVM+Te7KWOIy8M5BQOCyjw4Pi2+6ez5BkYABGkrwWDJUHDtVf NFyt6/sfM3vcDt9/sDUcjQtACYZfP13uLujhuIWEJGJigrAx4HQ9qubyOHS3KKgLHjo5 xVPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeUBmQhgBIQn9tSglYuV3takVsk7CZrVVNbr5yAgX+CJa/ZKVxc IOsmOxctyUJmfft3UV8loIAQHgzPJN3hxjHqwq8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5p2XGrt1SvjziD5juKcpBkwcy3QozbQIil8ysn+lfNPexstyMFVpF280kwhsr9k5LN2iYC5+8u2Kqpz0So72Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d1:: with SMTP id r17mr28568442ota.36.1546530612972; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 07:50:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADaq8jewG+MYPgVRyqg4dM0-W4qOm=rgoyZ==w6OmowvipXtfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jewG+MYPgVRyqg4dM0-W4qOm=rgoyZ==w6OmowvipXtfw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 10:50:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CADaq8jciVYN6uwLJJjuE+ObgDc5=37LD53C_TUvEdUTx2Ns0Qw@mail.gmail.com>
To: spencer shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>, Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4-ads@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d21287057e8fb7b5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/x31lz7fDJiyfo1iIyb9cXeO2b0w>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:50:15 -0000

It's now over three weeks since the end of working group last call and the
document is still in WGLC and no steps have been taken either to move the
document forward or indicate reasons why it should not move forward.  If
there are are issues that need to be addressed, please let me know what
they are.

Normally,  I would have sent weekly reminders but two-weeks-after-WGLC
turned out to be Chistmas Eve and three-weeks-after turned out to be New
years Eve.  So I skipped those and am sending out the three-weeks-after
reminder a bit late.   I will send our another reminder if necessary on
1/10, one month after the end of WGLC.

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:20 PM David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:

> IIRC, Working Group Last Call on this document ended a week ago.
>
> Could you please update the document state, to reflect the results of Last
> Call.   Since there were no additional  comments, I believe Last Call
> completed successfully and we should move on to the next step, which as I
> understand it, requires you to produce a write-up.
>
> Once that is done, I believe it is up to Spencer D. to review the documemt
> after which it can follow mv0-trunking-update in being considered by the
> IESG.  Also, somewhere in there, a document shephered needs to be
> designated.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email