Re: [nfsv4] Draft agenda

[David Noveck <[e-mail]>]

You need to post the date and time of the meeting for non-JST participants
(UTC is ok) and provide links for participation.


On Sat, Mar 25, 2023, 11:28 PM Chris Inacio <[e-mail]> wrote:

> All,
>
> IETF week has started - so here is the final agenda (until people bash
> it.). This is mostly just taking David Black’s asks into account.
>
> Also looking for slides from speakers if you haven’t sent them in, please
> send them to [e-mail] as soon as reasonable.  Ideally, all
> slides are in by Thursday midday Japan time.  If you have already sent your
> slides in - thank you.  I definitely want to acknowledge that we already
> have some slides.  If you don’t intend to have slides, please let the
> chairs know that as well.
>
>
> ====
>
> IETF-116 NFSv4 WG Agenda
> Welcome (back) to Yokohama
>
> * Chairs Welcome / Agenda Bash (chairs)
> * WG status and interim meetings (5 min - chairs/all)
>         - interim meetings and draft progress
> * pNFS layout using NVMe (15 min - Hellwig)
> * RDMA Commit (10 min - Tom Talpey)
> * 5661-bis (20 min - Noveck/Chairs)
> * Delstid - Extending opening of files / Reporting of Errors via
> LAYOUTRETURN in NFSv4.2 (15 min - Haynes)
> * Implementation Status (10 min - Lever)
> * Sequence ID Calibration (10 min - Yang Jing)
>
> * end of IETF-116, safe travels
>
>
> Thank you,
> Nfsv4 chairs
>
> ----
> Chris Inacio
> [e-mail]
>
>
>
> On Mar 11, 2023, at 2:01 AM, Chris Inacio <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> As to those within the meeting changes, I think that’s all doable.  BUT,
> before I do those changes, Christoph is on site but leaving before the
> Friday meeting time.  We would like to change the actual WG time to
> accommodate that if possible.  Stay tuned - and then keep me honest!  You
> might need another round of suggestions IF we can get the meeting time
> changed; so I would look to hold off till then.
>
>
> Regards,
> ----
> Chris Inacio
> [e-mail]
>
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2023, at 11:56 AM, Black, David <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Chris and Dave,
>
> > The timing of this meeting really sucks for those in EDT.   This was not
> supposed to happen.
>
> timeanddate.com says that Friday, March 31 12:00pm (noon) in Yokohama
> (JST) is 11:00pm on Thursday, March 30 in Boston (EDT).
>
> I believe that I can make that time work.  It would help if the agenda
> were bashed so that Christoph’s pNFS layout using NVMe draft comes earlier
> with the aim of covering it (and Tom’s RDMA commit draft) before midnight
> EDT.  I’d suggest moving the pNFS layout using NVMe draft to follow the
> RDMA commit draft, if that doesn’t cause problems for other presenters.  Is
> that possible?
>
> Thanks, --David
>
> *From:* nfsv4 <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of *Chris Inacio
> *Sent:* Friday, March 10, 2023 9:31 AM
> *To:* David Noveck
> *Cc:* NFSv4
> *Subject:* Re: [nfsv4] Draft agenda
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
>
>
>
> Also, I would like to hear about any issues with the time slot as
> scheduled.
>
>
> You say you would like to hear about these issues but I don't believe you.
> But at least, you are willing to hear about these issues.
>
> The timing of this meeting really sucks for those in EDT.   This was not
> supposed to happen.
>
>
>
> Dave - as you know, I put comments in the schedule request asking for a
> time slot that was first thing in the morning to be as accommodative as
> possible to the participants I was aware of.  We didn’t get that slot.  I
> can have empathy without power to change the circumstances.  They powers
> that be, trying to solve their impossible scheduling problems, don’t give
> me preference (or you, or any of the other participants or chairs.) I would
> like this to be the best possible time slot for the working group.  I will
> ask again when I understand what people would like - but it doesn’t mean I
> can get it.
>
> With all that said - everyone, I’m still open to hearing feedback.
>
> Thanks
> Chris (as a chair)
>
>
>
>