[nfsv4] [3530bis] Meeting Minutes, 9/9/2010
Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 20:35 UTC
Return-Path: <Thomas.Haynes@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973C33A688E for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hx8Wix3yKdqk for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80773A68CC for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.56,342,1280732400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="446929057"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2010 13:36:04 -0700
Received: from sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com (sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.99.115.27]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id o89Ka4Vc004186 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtprsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.115]) by sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:36:04 -0700
Received: from RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.112]) by rtprsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:36:02 -0400
Received: from sdawkins3-lxp.hq.netapp.com ([10.34.17.94]) by RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:36:01 -0400
From: Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-2-814682806"
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:36:00 -0700
Message-Id: <F34C29E9-ACF6-488B-BF73-25B9B0F0C3BE@netapp.com>
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2010 20:36:01.0462 (UTC) FILETIME=[9DCA4D60:01CB505E]
Subject: [nfsv4] [3530bis] Meeting Minutes, 9/9/2010
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:35:40 -0000
3530bis Meeting Minutes, 9/9/2010 ------------------------------------------------ Attendees -------------- Tom Haynes (NetApp) Sorin Faibish (EMC) James Lentini (NetApp) Trond Myklebust (NetApp) Peter Staubach (EMC) Robert Thurlow (Oracle) Dave Noveck (EMC) Spencer Shepler (Microsoft) Bruce Fields (Red Hat) David Black (EMC) Minutes ----------- + IETF Note Well Agreement This is a reminder that our discussions are governed by the IETF Note Well Agreement. See: http://www.ietf.org/NOTEWELL.html We will start each week's meeting with this announcement. + Overview of layout of task list Discussed the organization - will work on grouping by priority and area. Priority will be Low, Medium, and High + Start triaging tasks Worked through the first 26 items Assigned priorities to most and some AIs on who will determine the history of an item. Tom asked for a review of the multi-server name space chapter, because of the impact of perhaps pulling fs_locations_info from 5661. He needs to provide specific sections, i.e., http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-04#section-7 The task list has been updated with notes from the meeting: http://github.com/loghyr/3530bis/blob/master/tasklist.txt + i18n's 15 minutes of fame The discussion focused on various models of how to fix the implementation in 3530 (and in 5661). Current approach is to fix 3530 to agree with actual implementations and then work on exactly how we want it to be. The first pass presented in IETF 78 needs review (see http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-04#section-12). + Extra We talked about what NFSv4.2 will be and whether we can start tracking against it. This was with regard to the discussion started by David Black on how to fix i18n in NFSv4.x. Spencer pointed out that the discussion on the mailing list captured the most recent philosophy/approach.
- [nfsv4] [3530bis] Meeting Minutes, 9/9/2010 Thomas Haynes