[nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5661 (6015)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 12 March 2020 01:14 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AA73A0F61 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kzUzD1YnIncn for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 520B53A0F5E for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 78ED4F40738; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: shepler@storspeed.com, mike@eisler.com, dnoveck@netapp.com, ietf@kuehlewind.net, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, beepee@gmail.com, davenoveck@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: sushil89@yahoo.com, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200312011438.78ED4F40738@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:14:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/zmU5aiDXC0Zatvyl4vySG3o_DdU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:19:38 -0700
Subject: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5661 (6015)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:14:45 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5661,
"Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Sushil Agarwal <sushil89@yahoo.com>

Section: 17

Original Text
CB_SEQUENCE             | OPT  

Corrected Text
CB_SEQUENCE             | REQ

The section 20.9.3 of CB_SEQUENCE says

"In each CB_COMPOUND request, CB_SEQUENCE MUST appear once and MUST be the
   first operation.  The error NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS MUST be returned
   when CB_SEQUENCE is found in any position in a CB_COMPOUND beyond the
   first.  If any other operation is in the first position of CB_COMPOUND, NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION MUST be returned."

Since CB_RECALL_SLOT is REQ operation in NFSv4.1. This make CB_COMPOUND as REQ procedure. Since CB_COMPOUND require CB_SEQUENCE as its first operation and hence CB_SEQUENCE must be required operation.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC5661 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-29)
Title               : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol
Publication Date    : January 2010
Author(s)           : S. Shepler, Ed., M. Eisler, Ed., D. Noveck, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network File System Version 4
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG