Re: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request

joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> Thu, 12 June 2014 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39D51B297B for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iyY3tMA0BKLV for <nfvcon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com (mail-pd0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03A241B2978 for <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id p10so428969pdj.21 for <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VwrZ957Vv1IabCWlJwclYKM/h2LuzmcCrhAXFfQJuRc=; b=GK+hNhtNfciZeqBcb8QwLK/tw2VyLrszoIOOjpvIISBsOl1bonQtjOcwar3TmENSBP z56LvyCQvVfwsnqk5xuCb/IZtWlxk5o5vCJJWlYhnpkTBE0HtwZjAJGi8VcrHWnmjhPs 53+2v0k+sVd2d5s2rXWPz/CoyJHUsD8NnkPv0O1mK9T13LEFro47oLkck2oZgaZoFEg6 HybTNfR6JVNcgNuzdVxwLhgzRwvutPWa0UiK8/Sp0gDeStS9s8QZOH9kb1OejWksMIse 1TvUL5g0XxcEhpMKVJHiI7zQ0Lq/SaGv9DFwftQXYF4rOoqNe0J3DMuMeTiWrivRnCW+ evtw==
X-Received: by 10.68.186.33 with SMTP id fh1mr9133560pbc.140.1402539162539; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbp.local (50-0-150-57.dsl.static.sonic.net. [50.0.150.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bu1sm77372438pbb.54.2014.06.11.19.12.40 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53990C97.7060109@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:12:39 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/30.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com>, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "<karagian@cs.utwente.nl>" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
References: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F650ED2E5@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F4F47C1E2@EXMBX23.ad.utwente.nl> <AEECF136-9F27-414A-848C-D58239000415@lucidvision.com> <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F650ED661@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F650ED661@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfvcon/eQTOUBh-DCkZkAybLI0SxMoJxBE
Cc: "Benoit Claise \(bclaise\)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "<nfvcon@ietf.org>" <nfvcon@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request
X-BeenThere: nfvcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "NFV \(Network Function Virtualization\) Configuration and Modeling" <nfvcon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfvcon/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfvcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon>, <mailto:nfvcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 02:12:44 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

yeah, so the ADs are working on mini-bof format sessions for the
ops-area, opsawg meeting.

we can give this time at the meeting. but in terms of longer term
efforts this needs to define itself better and flesh out the work that
it should be doing.

regards
joel

On 6/11/14, 6:38 PM, Songhaibin (A) wrote:
> Dear Thomas,
> 
> It will be updated by this week or early next week.
> 
> And by the way, the BoF request was denied.
> 
> Best Regards! -Haibin
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Nadeau
>> [mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014
>> 9:59 PM To: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>; Cc: Songhaibin (A);
>> <nfvcon@ietf.org>; Subject: Re: [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request
>> 
>> Is there an update to the problem statement draft? It's expired.
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 11, 2014, at 12:33 AM, <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>; wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Haibin,
>>> 
>>> Good action! I think that it is good to have this discussion in
>>> Toronto!
>>> 
>>> Best regards, Georgios
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: NFVCON
>>>> [mailto:nfvcon-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Songhaibin (A) 
>>>> Sent: woensdag 11 juni 2014 3:08 To: nfvcon@ietf.org Subject:
>>>> [NFVCON] NFVCon BoF request
>>>> 
>>>> Dear folks,
>>>> 
>>>> We sent a non-wg-forming BoF request to OPS AD for meeting at
>>>> Toronto. The goal of the BoF is NOT to form a working group,
>>>> but mainly with discussing the NFV use cases, to identify the
>>>> potential protocol extensions or interactions with existing
>>>> WGs (such like Netconf , SFC).
>>>> 
>>>> Now the information is on the bof wiki page.
>>>> 
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/bof
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards! -Haibin
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________ NFVCON
>>>> mailing list NFVCON@ietf.org 
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ NFVCON mailing
>>> list NFVCON@ietf.org 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ NFVCON mailing
> list NFVCON@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvcon
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlOZDJcACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrLTkwCdEXZXD7z0Y01qVtau8q2z0BEB
CnYAoIe5FpKrMXew/BD3oFOo/ECpy77g
=MdRR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----