IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Nfvrg] "Verification of NFV Services : Problem Statement and Challenges" draft

신명기 <mkshin@etri.re.kr> Thu, 17 September 2015 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mkshin@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: nfvrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfvrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79731A910E for <nfvrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.41
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.41 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WdRkEvfsT6Dx for <nfvrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpeg.etri.re.kr (smtpeg2.etri.re.kr [129.254.27.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D2DA1A9101 for <nfvrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SMTP4.etri.info (129.254.28.74) by SMTPEG2.etri.info (129.254.27.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:31:17 +0900
Received: from SMTP1.etri.info ([169.254.1.101]) by SMTP4.etri.info ([10.2.6.33]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:31:10 +0900
From: 신명기 <mkshin@etri.re.kr>
To: "Ramki_Krishnan@Dell.com" <Ramki_Krishnan@Dell.com>, "draft-shin-nfvrg-service-verification@ietf.org" <draft-shin-nfvrg-service-verification@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: "Verification of NFV Services : Problem Statement and Challenges" draft
Thread-Index: AdDrDzqvXAHllJYuS2uLO2qNgnwVxAF2FWGw
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:31:11 +0000
Message-ID: <06C280310C265A4B9DC07D8A5BC1CC581D86DE54@SMTP1.etri.info>
References: <DF91EBC32A031943A8B78D81D40122BC040238F9BD@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM>
In-Reply-To: <DF91EBC32A031943A8B78D81D40122BC040238F9BD@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM>
Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US
Content-Language: ko-KR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.217.8.44]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_06C280310C265A4B9DC07D8A5BC1CC581D86DE54SMTP1etriinfo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfvrg/tUxIzMw7SCirWTtaIooljRuPyrg>
Cc: "nfvrg@irtf.org" <nfvrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Nfvrg] "Verification of NFV Services : Problem Statement and Challenges" draft
X-BeenThere: nfvrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Function Virtualization Research Group \(NFVRG\) discussion list" <nfvrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nfvrg>, <mailto:nfvrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfvrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfvrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfvrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfvrg>, <mailto:nfvrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:31:20 -0000

Hi Ramki,

Thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions. As you know, we, authors are now trying to address them
including implementation examples and open source aspects.

We will reflect them in next revision as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Myung-Ki,

From: Nfvrg [mailto:nfvrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Ramki_Krishnan@Dell.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 11:54 PM
To: draft-shin-nfvrg-service-verification@ietf.org
Cc: nfvrg@irtf.org
Subject: [Nfvrg] "Verification of NFV Services : Problem Statement and Challenges" draft

*         Dear All,
Below are our thoughts on the “Verification of NFV Services : Problem Statement and Challenges” draft.

*         This draft lacks detailed implementation example(s) - our request to authors is to provide concrete infrastructure policy example(s) pertinent to service verification. Our suggestion is to use the examples in the draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-nfvrg-policy-based-rm-nfviaas/, which map to an implementation, as a guideline.

*         This would entail the following

o   Mapping to an implementation whose results can be shared; the implementation (specifically source code) could be open or closed

o   Identify gaps in the implementation and suggest ways to fill those gaps

Link to draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shin-nfvrg-service-verification/

Note: We see the community (and thus personal) benefit being maximized through an open source implementation. Relevant open source projects include but are not limited to OPNFV, OpenStack, OpenDaylight etc.

Thanks,
Ramki & Diego

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email