Re: [NGO] [Netconf] FW: WG Action: NETCONF Data Modeling Language(netmod)

Hi,

There are still unchertered items to discuss, so I would prefer to
keep NGO active.

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ngo-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ngo-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 11:47 AM
> To: Andy Bierman
> Cc: NETCONF Goes On; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [NGO] [Netconf] FW: WG Action: NETCONF Data 
> Modeling Language(netmod)
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Bierman [mailto:ietf@andybierman.com] 
> 
> > > 
> > 
> > Would it be possible to auto-subscribe the members of the NGO 
> > list to the NETMOD list?
> 
> Well, people started to subscribe five minutes after the
announcement
> was out. I guess that by this time one third of the ngo 
> subscribers may
> already be on netmod. I prefer people subscribing 
> individually, it's the
> IETF way if you want especially taking into account that ngo was not
> only about netmod. 
> 
> > 
> > I prefer to have both the YANG and NGO lists go away.
> > Discussions on unchartered work have mostly been about NETMOD.
> > Now that the NETMOD WG exists, there will not be enough email 
> > on NGO to warrant a separate list.
> 
> I agree about YANG as YANG is now a netmod component. I am somehow
> hesitating about ngo, as this was historically used for non
chartered
> NETCONF issues, and now it can be used also for not chartered NETMOD
> issues. This was kind of successful in letting people to focus on
> chartered items if they want to. 
> 
> However, if more people insist on shutting down ngo as well I will
not
> fight this fiercely. 
> 
> Dan
>  
> > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Dan
> > >
> > 
> > Andy
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> NGO mailing list
> NGO@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo
> 

_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo