Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & example use per draft-blanchet-ipngwg-testadd-00.txt, closes 20Jun01
itojun@iijlab.net Thu, 07 June 2001 04:29 UTC
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id AAA15446 for <ngtrans-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 00:29:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.170.5]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA09259; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:28:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id VAA28146; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.11.4+Sun/8.11.4) id f574SGh27519 for ngtrans-dist; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail3 [129.144.170.5]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.11.4+Sun/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f574SDe27512 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lukla.Sun.COM (lukla.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.31]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id VAA28127 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by lukla.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA04174 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:28:51 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1294B20; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:28:10 +0900 (JST)
To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
In-reply-to: moore's message of Thu, 07 Jun 2001 00:24:35 -0400. <200106070424.AAA01140@astro.cs.utk.edu>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Re: pTLA 3FFE:FFF0::/28 for test & example use per draft-blanchet-ipngwg-testadd-00.txt, closes 20Jun01
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 13:28:10 +0900
Message-ID: <27929.991888090@itojun.org>
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: itojun@iijlab.net
>as far as I can tell, this is very close to the same purpose as RFC 1918. >I don't know why we would expect different results this time around. > >instead, why don't we encourage folks who are doing testing to get an IPv4 >address from somewhere (surely they can find one...) and use the 6to4 >address block derived from that IPv4 address? they don't have to exchange >traffic between those nodes and the rest of the network if they don't >want to. but if they later decide they do want to exchange traffic >using those addresses, it will be possible for them to do so. we have a separate draft for this - draft-itojun-ipv6-local-experiment-02.txt. marc's one is more like "how to write example configuration down onto manual pages". since we don't know what IPv4 address the readers would use, we cannot really generate 6to4 prefix. itojun