RE: (ngtrans) Re: [mobile-ip] IPv4 and MIPv6 Transition

??? <kahng@tiger.korea.ac.kr> Mon, 29 October 2001 07:34 UTC

Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA06781 for <ngtrans-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 02:34:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.170.5]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA25625; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 23:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail3.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id XAA18816; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 23:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.2.Beta0+Sun/8.12.2.Beta0) with ESMTP id f9T7UsQO001877 for <ngtrans-dist@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 23:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.2.Beta0+Sun/8.12.2.Beta0/Submit) id f9T7Us8o001876 for ngtrans-dist; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 23:30:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: sunroof.eng.sun.com: majordomo set sender to owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com using -f
Received: from engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail4 [129.144.134.6]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.12.2.Beta0+Sun/8.12.2.Beta0) with ESMTP id f9T7UpQO001869; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 23:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from saturn.sun.com (saturn.EBay.Sun.COM [129.150.69.2]) by engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id XAA06986; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 23:30:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tiger.korea.ac.kr (tiger.korea.ac.kr [163.152.209.1]) by saturn.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA12133; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 23:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LocalHost (ccl.korea.ac.kr [163.152.217.76]) by tiger.korea.ac.kr (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f9T7Rjs28412; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:27:45 +0900
From: ??? <kahng@tiger.korea.ac.kr>
To: Shiao-Li Charles Tsao <sltsao@itri.org.tw>, mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subject: RE: (ngtrans) Re: [mobile-ip] IPv4 and MIPv6 Transition
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:26:32 +0900
Message-ID: <KPEGJCHEODAGGLGIDBIEGEIFCFAA.kahng@tiger.korea.ac.kr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0093_01C16096.78B281D0"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
In-Reply-To: <008101c15db5$69a688f0$3168608c@utopia>
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ??? <kahng@tiger.korea.ac.kr>

Also, we are working on this now. 
You can find our paper, which will be sent to IETF as a darft soon.
The tile is "requirements for 4to6 mobility transition using hierarchical mobility."

Up to date, since the effects of considering mobile node roaming in IPv4/IPv6 transition networks have not been investigated fully, we propose the requirements and analysis of diferent routing architecture of <IPv4/MIPv6 transition network.

We are working on the problem solving mechanism according to the requirements.

Please refer to:
http://hard.korea.ac.kr/~ccl/research/draft_kahng_ngtrans_hdsma-00.txt


  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com [mailto:owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com]On Behalf Of Shiao-Li Charles Tsao
  Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:30 AM
  To: mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com
  Cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
  Subject: (ngtrans) Re: [mobile-ip] IPv4 and MIPv6 Transition


  Hello, 

  This approach was also addressed in "Moving in a Dual Stack Internet" <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ngtrans-moving-00.txt>. 
  It is a WG draft in NGTRANS. However, this approach can be only applied to a MN with a co-located IPv4 address in the visited IPv4 network. To work with NAT and DHCP in the visited IPv4 network, it seems a pratical scenario and should be further investigated. 

  Charles Tsao


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "KASSI-LAHLOU Mohammed FTRD/DMI/CAE" <mohamed.kassilahlou@rd.francetelecom.com>
  To: <mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com>
  Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:41 PM
  Subject: RE: [mobile-ip] IPv4 and MIPv6 Transition


  Hello,

  If the MN and the HA are dual-stack, the solution could be the following:
  On the home network, the MN receives an Ipv6 RA with the H bit set and an
  Ipv4 RA with the H bit set.
  When the MN arrives on the visited Ipv4 network, it acquires an Ipv4 CoA
  (co-located CoA) and tunnels Ipv6 BU in Ipv4 packets to its HA.
  The HA intercepts Ipv6 packets intended for the MN and tunnels them to the
  MN in Ipv4 packets.
  The MN tunnels Ipv6 packets intended for the CN in Ipv4 packets to the HA.
  The HA decapsulates the packets and sends them directly to the CN.

  The same solution can be used when the CN is Ipv4 and the visited network is
  Ipv6.

  I do not know any developments about this but it could be a new work item.

  Kassi

  -----Message d'origine-----
  De : Eng Soo Guan [mailto:engsg@cwc.nus.edu.sg]
  Envoyé : mercredi 24 octobre 2001 11:07
  À : mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com
  Objet : Re: [mobile-ip] IPv4 and MIPv6 Transition


  Thanx for your reply.

  I read the SITT and DSTM draft. My question is that MN is using DSTM. But
  there are possible cases where MN cannot obtain a "IPv4 Global Addresses".
  As such, the SITT and DSTM solution is not what I am looking for.

  If a MN visits a foreign IPv4 network running NAT and DHCP (and no 6to4,
  Tunnel Broker or 6over4 stuff), how can the MN sends a Binding Update to its
  Home Agent in IPv6? Can the MN uses some configuration information it has
  when it was previously at home to access the 6Bone?

  The best candidate I see it Shipworm. I'm wondering if anyone has come
  across other proposals.

  SG
  Soo Guan, Eng
  R&D Engineer (Software Lab)
  Centre for Wireless Communications, NUS
  http://www.cwc.nus.edu.sg
  Tel (65) 8709330
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Hesham Soliman (EPA)
  To: 'mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com'
  Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:12 PM
  Subject: RE: [mobile-ip] IPv4 and MIPv6 Transition


  Hello Eng,
  There is another draft you can find at:
  http://standards.ericsson.net/hesham/draft-ietf-ngtrans-siit-dstm-00.txt
  It's a WG draft in NGTRANS but it expired and I'll
  resubmit it after adding some of the comments received.
  Cheers,
  Hesham


  -----Original Message-----
  From:   Eng Soo Guan [SMTP:engsg@cwc.nus.edu.sg]
  Sent:   Wednesday, 24 October 2001 12:04
  To:     mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com
  Subject:        [mobile-ip] IPv4 and MIPv6 Transition
  Dear All,
  I would like to know if any work has being done with regard to 'transiting'
  to Mobile IPv6 with IPv4 Internet, especially with Mobile Node behing a NAT.
  The closet drafts I find are "Mobile IPv4 Traversal Across NAT and VPN
  Gateways" and "Mobility Support for IPv4 and IPv6 Interconnected Networks
  based on Dual-Stack Model".
  I read found the NGTRANS Shipworm draft attractive to be modified for MIPv6
  in a IPv4 only network behind a NAT.
  Warmest regards.
  SG
  Soo Guan, Eng
  Centre for Wireless Communications, NUS
  http://www.cwc.nus.edu.sg
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~