Re: (ngtrans) Grenoble Discussion - Proposals to assist "initial" transition of IPv6
Bob Fink <fink@es.net> Fri, 22 January 1999 04:05 UTC
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with SMTP id XAA06887 for <ngtrans-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 23:05:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engmail4 [129.144.134.6]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id TAA11930; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:38:25 -0800
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3) with ESMTP id TAA18055; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:38:23 -0800
Received: by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.9.2+Sun/8.9.2) id TAA16886 for ngtrans-dist; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engmail2 [129.146.1.25]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.9.2+Sun/8.9.2) with SMTP id TAA16879 for <ngtrans@sunroof>; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earth.sun.com (earth.EBay.Sun.COM [129.150.69.3]) by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3) with SMTP id TAA19418 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:35:00 -0800
Received: from mail1.es.net (mail1.es.net [198.128.3.181]) by earth.sun.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA20510 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pinnacle.wins.lbl.gov (pinnacle) [128.3.9.220] by mail1.es.net with smtp (Exim 1.81 #2) id 103XN6-0005Rx-00; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:35:00 -0800
Message-Id: <4.1.19990121193159.00aa7510@imap2.es.net>
X-Sender: rlfink@imap2.es.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:34:45 -0800
To: Kazuaki Tsuchiya <tsuchi@ebina.hitachi.co.jp>, bound@zk3.dec.com, ngtrans@sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM
From: Bob Fink <fink@es.net>
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Grenoble Discussion - Proposals to assist "initial" transition of IPv6
In-Reply-To: <199901211324.WAA25586@newton.ebina.hitachi.co.jp>
References: <199901201544.KAA0000027253@wasted.zk3.dec.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ngtrans@sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM
Kazuaki, At 10:25 PM 1/21/99 +0900, Kazuaki Tsuchiya wrote: >Dear Jim, > >At 10:44 99/01/20 -0500, Jim Bound wrote: >Jim> The list below are the ones I would think are important for >Jim> initial deployment and then I list the ones which may be needed later. >Jim> We can debate the order but covering the first set would be a lot of >Jim> work if folks want we can cover the second set at Minnieapolis. >Jim> >Jim> draft-ietf-ngtrans-dti-00.txt (note this proposal contrasts and >Jim> compares the others here in the draft and I think incorrectly but I will >Jim> be sending my input on this to the list before Grenoble soon). >Jim> >Jim> draft-ietf-ngtrans-natpt-04.txt >Jim> >Jim> draft-ietf-ngtrans-siit-04.txt >Jim> >Jim> draft-ietf-ngtrans-assgn-ipv4-addrs-01.txt >Jim> >Jim> Could I ask for some volunteers to help lead with me such a discussion >Jim> and if possible do some prepartory work with me offline? >Jim> >Jim> The ones we need to do later are: >Jim> >Jim> draft-ietf-ngtrans-dual-stack-hosts-00.txt >Jim> > >We think that our tool is useful especially in the initial stage >where we can't prepare IPv6 applications. I want to tell Ngtrans >folks that in Grenoble. > >Would you please include me into the agenda on Wednesday or Thursday? You will have time to speak. Thanks, Bob