Re: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversial
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Tue, 17 July 2001 17:10 UTC
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id NAA22064 for <ngtrans-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:10:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM ([129.144.134.6]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA15384; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:10:34 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from sunroof.eng.sun.com (sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM [129.146.168.88]) by engmail4.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id KAA20528; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.11.5.Beta0+Sun/8.11.5.Beta0) id f6HH9ZN24464 for ngtrans-dist; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM (engmail1 [129.146.1.13]) by sunroof.eng.sun.com (8.11.5.Beta0+Sun/8.11.5.Beta0) with ESMTP id f6HH9WN24457 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.43]) by engmail1.Eng.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v2.1p1) with ESMTP id KAA28848 for <ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com>; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netcore.fi (netcore.fi [193.94.160.1]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA14645; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:09:42 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f6HH9gO28533; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 20:09:42 +0300
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 20:09:42 +0300
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@sun.com>
cc: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversial
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010717092456.03653a70@jurassic>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107171958240.28235-100000@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Alain Durand wrote: > Next IETF in London, we (chairs) would like to organise a discussion > on IPv6 tunnels that cross IPv4 NATs. > We already have 2 drafts from Christian Huitema > draft-ietf-ngtrans-natreq4ipv4-00.txt You mean draft-ietf-ngtrans-natreq4ipv6-00.txt :-) > draft-huitema-shipworm-00.txt Is this something new, not yet published? I couldn't find any references to it anywhere. > We would like to organise a 20-30 mins sessions on the topic. > If you have ideas that you would like to present on the topic, > (a publish draft is not required), please sent Tony, Bob & me > an email. Well, a crux here is whether the mechanisms are needed for the user to tunnel IPv6 into NAT regardless of what ISP does (e.g. using a protocol that can traverse NAT after a fashion already, like UDP, instead of IP protocol 41), or whether "ISP-driven" approach is acceptable. If it can be assumed that "ISP Is the Good Guy" and actually wants to enable ipv6 if it's in any way possible, then there are various options for this.. but I fear this may not be valid in practise for a long time yet. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
- Re: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Michael Richardson
- Re: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Pekka Savola
- RE: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… George Tsirtsis
- RE: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Jim Bound
- RE: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… George Tsirtsis
- RE: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Pekka Savola
- RE: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Pekka Savola
- RE: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Christian Huitema
- Re: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Michael Richardson
- Re: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Keith Moore
- RE: (ngtrans) call for discussion on NAT traversi… Christian Huitema