Re: Class B vs. lots of class C's
epg@merit.edu Tue, 09 February 1993 22:52 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10662; 9 Feb 93 17:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10658; 9 Feb 93 17:52 EST
Received: from merit.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23774; 9 Feb 93 17:53 EST
Return-Path: <epg@merit.edu>
Received: from pepper.merit.edu by merit.edu (5.65/1123-1.0) id AA16334; Tue, 9 Feb 93 17:46:30 -0500
Received: by pepper.merit.edu (4.1/client-0.9) id AA07640; Tue, 9 Feb 93 17:49:19 EST
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1993 17:49:19 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: epg@merit.edu
Message-Id: <9302092249.AA07640@pepper.merit.edu>
To: aggarwal@r2d2.jvnc.net, long@nic.near.net
Subject: Re: Class B vs. lots of class C's
Cc: njm@merit.edu
Dan,
I believe that the NIC is already assigning C's out of the North
American number space. So it is reasonable to request the
Cs especially if only a subset of them will be announced in
the near future.
--Elise
- Class B vs. lots of class C's Vikas Aggarwal
- Re: Class B vs. lots of class C's Dan Long
- Re: Class B vs. lots of class C's epg
- Re: Class B vs. lots of class C's William Manning
- Re: Class B vs. lots of class C's William Manning