IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Nmop] [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG Adoption Call for draft-feng-opsawg-incident-management-04

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 20 February 2024 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: nmop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E81FC157937; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 06:49:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-IkRCNrafSZ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 06:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86032C31A626; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 06:48:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7443898B; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:48:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id U8WBr-b5hMvF; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:48:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7E638988; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:48:32 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1708440512; bh=xx7vJa1M9y2+aTaSLh0KA4lihLaKdbQEjo8HG0gsPT8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Y8pBRHwWMtFmHdycBIBdWKmLlYVqyhBNKJJoLkSJktvAUkQ43EAX6UFVIIhKz1/cl FFjxJrOQia+FYr6ysbrIRcSnIknRIfztM22Y0lQsiftAmhc163rQUpMhqZHK37TYdN /xfoPjnTe2FZuKBsPxUvQDBAL566wL4UB8AdSFV6CwU/Nh8YohUidm/1BtSGgT1Dug KJ8eeX8gextHAW7svrdBEV9CR+kQJ830NlJg1yNnS36LamPi8p2LjDb5ortTPiFcr+ E2DKXoztmQuzafwFp7u38kPujL5mfce1OdDqNYehqPUJe4H1/TeLw9ScDvgDppjUoD YHv8X+M5bJZcw==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A40A5; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:48:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: OPSAWG <opsawg@ietf.org>, "nmop@ietf.org" <nmop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <97e25762a5d54b1f9ff9fd22f741059e@huawei.com>
References: <97e25762a5d54b1f9ff9fd22f741059e@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:48:32 -0500
Message-ID: <31922.1708440512@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmop/A4klrBShWs_McFVtwNXGhwD1ywQ>
Subject: Re: [Nmop] [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG Adoption Call for draft-feng-opsawg-incident-management-04
X-BeenThere: nmop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Management Operations \(NMOP\) Working Group" <nmop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nmop>, <mailto:nmop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nmop/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmop>, <mailto:nmop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:49:19 -0000

Qin Wu <bill.wu=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Hi, NMOP Chairs: Since this document has been discussed in OPSAWG for a
    > long time, and because it was ready for adoption there, and considering
    > that it is now 'suddenly' in scope for NMOP, could we please consider
    > moving the existing adoption poll to NMOP (perhaps extending it to make
    > up for time when NMOP was not aware of the poll).

That sounds like a good idea to me.

I'll point out that WG chairs adopt documents by fiat: it's up to them.
[with being replaced by the AD if they do the wrong thing]
This business with consulting people is a courtesy :-)
So, Benoit and Mohammed (NMOP chairs) can just do this.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IΓΈT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email