[NMOP] Re: [External] Prioritization of requirements in draft-ietf-nmop-rfc3535-20years-later [Commercial - Anyone]

[Brad Peters <[e-mail]>]

Hi Luis,

Providing some feedback as requested.

Just reviewing sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4, one key point that stands out is the strong requirements in section 3.3 and how they were rationalized in section 3.4. Discussions during the meeting and subsequent working groups focused on enabling automation through ML/AI to create value for operators. For instance, NMOP’s anomaly detection and assessment of service impact require integration. While interface and API exposure are important, operator adoption also depends on ease of implementation and IT integration. Although section 3.4 captures earlier discussions on speed, it does not clearly address how those elements support easier adoption and integration into an operator’s environment. Furthermore, the integration and deployability considerations in section 3.2 seem limited to a specific business unit within an operator, which generally does not provide an ability to build a compelling business case for adoption.

As most Telcos look to perform automation via encoded knowledge, Section 3.4 becomes important in from system to system interaction point of view. This implies greater integration requirements than human requirements.


Cheers.


Brad

________________________________
From: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, 29 October 2025 7:17 AM
To: Nmop <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] [NMOP] Prioritization of requirements in draft-ietf-nmop-rfc3535-20years-later


EXTERNAL SENDER – Be cautious opening Links and Attachments

Dear all,



For the progression of draft-ietf-nmop-rfc3535-20years-later, authors would like to request feedback about the set requirements considered relevant from the perspective of the WG. Specifically, section 3.4 of the document intends to identify agreed priorities with regards those requirements.



The draft updates will be presented during IETF 124, so our idea is to collect the feedback received and include it in the presentation.



Please, go through the document and provide your views on priorities so that we can report on it during NMOP session.



Thanks in advance



Luis (on behalf of the authors)



________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição