Re: [nmrg] NRMG Activity on Autonomics

Dear Lisandro, Olivier,

I am thinking of 3 short presentations I could give (10-15 min. each, 
depending on time allowed):
     1) Experiences in deployment of autonomic functions in IP/(G)MPLS 
networks covering:
         .Risk-aware routing for IGP-LS protocols [IM2013 
<http://tinyurl.com/oypujfz>] and Adaptive level of recovery for GMPLS 
networks [ICC2012 <http://tinyurl.com/nt2jl33>].
         .Network-wide scheduling of OSPF Graceful Restarts [CNSM2010 
<http://tinyurl.com/q68pphp>].
         .Root cause analysis for IP-VPNs [ICC2013 
<http://www.ieee-icc.org/2013/NGN.html>].
        The goal is to show how (different) autonomic functionality can 
enhance IP networks' capability and operations.

     2) A running implementation of an autonomic networking framework 
[ICC2012 <http://tinyurl.com/pes68qp>].
        The goal is to outline the potential common building blocks, 
interfaces, models. It could be a good complement to the framework 
proposed by Michael, and inputs to a wider NMRG investigation.

     3) Towards operationally-safe autonomic networks [BLTJ2012 
<http://tinyurl.com/pcldhpj>].
        A slightly more prospective (but equally important) topic on how 
to guarantee trust in autonomic functions at the design- and 
operation-time (e.g. stability, robustness).

In parallel, I also fully support the start of an I-D on autonomic 
networking terms, and volunteer to write a first text before Vancouver 
(which could be discussed on site/during the sessions). I will try to 
share a first draft ASAP.

Best regards, Laurent.

On 21/10/2013 15:16, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:
> NMRG,
>
> We would like to present two documents in the upcoming NMRG meeting:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-behringer-autonomic-network-framework-01
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap-01
>
> The first is our vision and framework on autonomic networking, it includes also our definitions in this space, for discussion.
>
> The second is an autonomic way to bootstrap trust in a domain.
>
> Sorry for the late post, but we wanted to update the documents before suggesting. I'm looking forward to the meeting!
>
> Michael
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nmrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:nmrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Olivier Festor
>> Sent: 21 September 2013 07:59
>> To: nmrg@irtf.org
>> Subject: [nmrg] NRMG Activity on Autonomics
>>
>> Dear NMRG subscribers,
>>
>> Over the last couple of years, Autonomics has gained a lot attention in both
>> academia and industry. After the initial "buzz", the basic concepts of
>> autonomics remain extremely promising in the area of networking, in
>> particular when considering the flexibilty provided by the emerging
>> technologies in virtualization and software defined networking.  In this
>> context, a focused activity on Autonomics is proposed within the Network
>> Management Research Group. A dedicated session will take place during
>> the next IETF meeting in Vancouver (a slot for the NMRG has been
>> requested to this end). Initial discussions on importance and possible
>> contributions in terms of I-Ds to the IRTF on this topic include:
>>
>>   - an IRTF-NMRG definition of Autonomic networking terms
>>   - Report and sharing of experiences in (un-)successful deployment of
>> autonomic functions in IP networks.
>>
>> We invite all of you to contribute to the discussion that will start on this list
>> and invite you to consider submitting (and contributing to) I-Ds  in this area
>> in the near future.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> /Olivier Festor & Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville.
>> NMRG Co-Chairs
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nmrg mailing list
>> nmrg@irtf.org
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg
> _______________________________________________
> nmrg mailing list
> nmrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg
>
>