[nmrg] [IANA #811486] Conflict Review requested for draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis
"Pearl Liang via RT" <drafts-eval@iana.org> Tue, 10 March 2015 15:35 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100C41A020B; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J50Hoaqx-bvA; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.lax.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E34ED1A065C; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t2AFZPuF000331; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:35:25 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9B0B6C20839; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:35:25 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: pearl.liang
From: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150305080824.20635.45613.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-811486@icann.org> <20150305080824.20635.45613.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-20424-1426001725-1912.811486-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #811486
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: pearl.liang@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:35:25 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/CLFmUivepgBQvfMJTjHWZudsYrs>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:33:17 -0700
Cc: draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis.all@ietf.org, nmrg@irtf.org, irsg@irtf.org, nmrg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [nmrg] [IANA #811486] Conflict Review requested for draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-eval@iana.org
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:35:38 -0000
(BEGIN IANA COMMENTS) IESG/Authors: IANA has reviewed draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis version 04 and has the following comments: We understand that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA Actions that need completion. While it is helpful for the IANA Considerations section of the document to remain in place upon publication, if the authors prefer to remove it, IANA doesn't object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. Thanks, Pearl Liang ICANN (END IANA COMMENTS) On Thu Mar 05 08:08:48 2015, noreply@ietf.org wrote: > Lars Eggert has requested a conflict review for: > draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis > General Gap Analysis for Autonomic Networking > > The conflict review is being tracked at > <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-nmrg-an-gap- > analysis/>
- [nmrg] [IANA #811486] Conflict Review requested f… Pearl Liang via RT