[nmrg] [Fwd: [Anima] ANIMA draft charter]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 06 August 2014 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8FC1A0016 for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVsnG_0-mLv8 for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7CC1A0339 for <nmrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id g18so1304760oah.20 for <nmrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cqNdCR3u1gWYIlPC9E0ljilAhS+SKUy6Q0aZlz7ezQA=; b=D5RRk2QgG2RhT5Ii/JMNkEQiPEhW8hK4KQxZFyJLpLUsQLttjyT+UDJvWNAoU2nFpG ar5R8YUhNJllaud01SQJpAyBw3yCLhEOeypKr+wiRidXRN/jfcU2K6OmCRusrADJuEdI 76TkB2sDOw+Qb9IND83TQ4MDLaJIrhmfzGPwvZ88eN3wWYLUNcIv8fMSOGarRBg7WHjB JX6OZvbqpCTPgJFOm5+BO1kfshkcYSF/7fI9RZkdAYyAj5Pkq8s/3FXBvGegdJJ1TgX9 kczfYdM2vIxgKtYM+hvIKSR0BZGeyOj/RgcolKb9ndaEYt+jpass5B+0XQCgjSunwpoF hg8Q==
X-Received: by 10.182.118.193 with SMTP id ko1mr10596413obb.45.1407284534034; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:22:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.24.60.8] (wireless-nat-21.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.30.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h1sm13365767oem.5.2014.08.05.17.22.12 for <nmrg@irtf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53E17539.3060809@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 12:22:17 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nmrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/RFzVMteJT3oV4oDkIouATwUl6M0
Subject: [nmrg] [Fwd: [Anima] ANIMA draft charter]
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: anima@ietf.org
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:22:18 -0000

FYI. Discussion over on the Anima list please.

   Brian

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Anima] ANIMA draft charter
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:19:15 +0000
From: Michael Behringer (mbehring) <mbehring@cisco.com>
To: anima@ietf.org <anima@ietf.org>

At the BoF in Toronto there was rough consensus to continue the work on an autonomic infrastructure. Brian, Sheng, Toerless,
Laurent and I have now drafted a potential WG charter with the input of our ADs. Note that this is not yet a formal charter
proposal, it's for discussion only so far.

The assumption is that more general aspects of autonomics will continue to be discussed in the NMRG group.

If we were to go ahead with a WG, the goal would be to focus on realistic deliverables. So the plan is to start with a small,
achievable set of deliverables, and, if successful and useful, expand after re-chartering.

Please comment here on this draft charter proposal.

Thanks,
Michael


Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach (ANIMA) WG

Description of Working Group

Autonomic Networking focuses on self-management of network elements. An autonomic function works in a distributed way across
various network elements, allowing however central guidance and reporting. Autonomic functions already exist today, for example
IGP routing protocols such as OSPF. However, all such functions have their own discovery, transport, messaging and security
mechanisms.

To transform the somewhat abstract Autonomic Networking concept into concrete, realisable requirements, the first stage,
undertaken in the Network Management Research Group (NMRG) of the IRTF, was to define terminology and design goals, and to
derive a high-level gap analysis. The definitions and design goals, as well as a simple architecture model are defined in
draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions; the gap analysis for AN is described in draft-irtf-nmrg-an-gap-analysis. The UCAN
BoF at IETF 90 discussed use cases and some existing solutions. All the above work serves as a baseline for this working group.

This working group defines solutions for an initial set of components of an autonomic networking infrastructure, based on the
simple architecture and design goals defined in draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions. Future work may include a more
detailed systems architecture to support the development of autonomic service agents. The Anima working group will initially
focus on enterprise, ISP networks and IoT.

The solutions target to cover the following areas:
o identity of nodes
o common security model
o discovery model
o negotiation model
o a secure and logically separated communications channel
o an example for an autonomic management model

The goals of this working group are:

o Definition of a generic discovery and negotiation protocol for autonomic functions
   Starting point: draft-jiang-config-negotiation-protocol
o Definition of a mechanism to bootstrap a trust infrastructure
   Starting point: draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures
o Definition of an logically separated Autonomic Control Plane
   Starting point: draft-behringer-autonomic-control-plane

In addition, autonomic service agents will need to be defined for specific use cases. The working group will initially consider
one simple example as a test case for further work.

o Definition of <a selected use case by the group>
  Starting point: draft-use-case-tbd

The initial set of work items is limited to the above list to stay focused and avoid "boiling the ocean". Additional documents
concerning policy intent, other autonomic infrastructure components, use cases or autonomic service agents are strongly
encouraged, as individual submissions, but are not planned as working group deliverables for now. No additional work items will
be accepted in the working group without re-chartering.

Milestones

Nov 2014 - WG formation and adoption of drafts
           - Mar IETF -
Jun 2015 - WGLC for draft-generic-discovery-negotiation-protocol
           - Jul IETF -
Aug 2015 - submit draft-generic-discovery-negotiation-protocol to IESG (standards track)
Oct 2015 - WGLC draft-keyinfrastructure-bootstrap
Oct 2015 - WGLC draft-use-case-tbd
           - Nov IETF -
Dec 2015 - submit draft-keyinfrastructure-bootstrap to IESG  (standards track)
Dec 2015 - submit draft-use-case-tbd to IESG  (standards track)
Jan 2016 - WGLC draft-autonomic-common-control-plane
           - Mar IETF -
Apr 2016 - submit draft-autonomic-common-control-plane to IESG  (standards track)
Jul 2016 - recharter if needed, or close

--

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima


-- 
Regards
   Brian Carpenter
   http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7924-6182