[nmrg] trace meta data and anonymization / pseudonymization

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Thu, 31 July 2008 13:35 UTC

Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by bierator.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id m6VDZDdq030746 for <nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:18 +0200
Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51CEC0036 for <nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DrFi-DwVxerk; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F81C001D; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id B999A67F2DA; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:35:04 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
Message-ID: <20080731133504.GB24152@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-IBRFilter-SpamReport: -2.599 () BAYES_00
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 134.169.34.9
Subject: [nmrg] trace meta data and anonymization / pseudonymization
X-BeenThere: nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
List-Id: Network Management Research Group <nmrg.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/pipermail/nmrg>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:35:20 -0000

Hi,

during the review of <draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-05>, two items
popped up several times:

a) trace meta-data

   The question is what meta-data should be recoded, what should it
   include, are there specific formats to record meta-data etc.

b) trace anonymization/pseudonymization

   Which anonymization/pseudonymization transforms are out there and
   how strong are they or which pitfalls should be known/avoided while
   doing trace anonymization.

I believe both subjects are important and especially b) is also
relevant for work in the IETF (the IPFIX WG is starting to work on
anonymization mediators for IPFIX).

I am just bringing this up here so that people are aware of this
outcome of the review process and if there are people who are actually
interested to work on some of this, please speak up and we can see
whether there is sufficient interest and critical mass.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>