[nmrg] FW: draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-05 IRSG poll

"Bert Wijnen - IETF" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Fri, 04 July 2008 10:00 UTC

From: Bert Wijnen - IETF <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
To: Nmrg <nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:00:57 +0200
Message-ID: <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNAEEMFBAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
Subject: [nmrg] FW: draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-05 IRSG poll
Precedence: list

NMRG, this is FYI.

Unfortunately I was not aware that I needed to start the poll, and 
only learned this after returning from my vacation.

Anyway, let us hope that the IRSG approves this document within the
next couple of weeks.

Bert Wijnen 
document shepherd

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Bert Wijnen - IETF [mailto:bertietf@bwijnen.net]
Verzonden: vrijdag 4 juli 2008 11:54
Aan: IRSG
Onderwerp: draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-05 IRSG poll



The IRSG review for draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-04.txt was completed
late May, by Karen R. Sollins, and the draft has been revised as
into a new version draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-05.txt on which Karen
and the NMRG have given their OK.

The draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-05.txt is available at:

 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-05.txt

The IRSG review is available form the IRTF Tracker web page at:

 http://www3.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/9 

This is a two-week IRSG poll.

Please use one of the poll responses defined in
  http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-rfcs-01.txt 
(the draft has unfortunately expired, but is still there). 
Those possible poll responses are:

     o  'Ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read and reasonably
         detailed review

     o  'Not ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read, reasonably
        detailed review, and actionable comments.

     o  'No objection' -- I don't object if this document goes forward;
        I've read the document (perhaps quickly); I have some small
        comments which are not show stoppers; I don't have great
        expertise in the area.

     o  'Request more time to review' -- a commitment to provide a
        thorough review in a specified period of time.

And the most relevant rule is that "At least two other IRSG
members (besides the one sponsoring the document) need to
vote 'ready to publish' for the document to move forward."
So please read and vote,

Many thanks,
Bert Wijnen (Document Shepherd).
p.s. I assume that Juergen Schienwaelder sponsors the document,
but he is also author, so that is why I am shepherding.

[nmrg] FW: draft-irtf-nmrg-snmp-measure-05 IRSG p… Bert Wijnen - IETF