[nmrg] Cross-RG activity coordination on Intent Based Networking (IBN)

Laurent Ciavaglia <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C4112E567 for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtLtXHkK2dww for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EFB212E167 for <nmrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id B87FF56D5D061; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:57:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr712umx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u3CMvO2g026922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:57:24 GMT
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u3CMvMD6028521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:57:23 +0200
Received: from [135.224.195.23] (135.239.27.38) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:57:22 +0200
From: Laurent Ciavaglia <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>
To: "nmrg@irtf.org" <nmrg@irtf.org>
Organization: Bell Labs
Message-ID: <570D7D51.5030800@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:57:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010301010507030105010202"
X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.38]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/uub0MI6tGLBm_RDlaaOQuMYqvds>
Cc: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>, Kohei Shiomoto <shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: [nmrg] Cross-RG activity coordination on Intent Based Networking (IBN)
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:57:31 -0000

Dear NMRG,

Intent Based Networking aspires at rising network manageability to a 
higher level.
As such, the various forms of IBN continue to be a compelling area of 
research and technology development.
Yet, the IBN term may convey different meanings and refer to different 
concepts or approaches, e.g. as in ANIMA WG, SUPA (BoF), IBNEMO, or SDN 
RG...
Thus, we believe some coordination among RG/WG can deliver additional 
value to the community.
Jointly with the SDN RG, we would like to impulse an activity on IBN to 
discuss the objectives, scope and kick start this effort.

The items listed below can help to get things started:
     -What are the definitions of Intent/IBN? e.g. in SUPA, ANIMA, SDN, 
NFV, IoT spaces...
     -What are the alignment/commonalities and differences among them, 
and the implications from technology, standard and business perspectives?
     -What are the functionality / components of an intent based system?
     -Is an end-to-end, comprehensive intent based system feasible? Does 
it make sense?
     -How can different techno-specific / heterogeneous sources of 
intent (definitions / blocks) inter-operate, in intra- and inter-domains?
     -What are the (key) areas of research? languages, 
semantics/ontologies, human factors/HNI, model-driven-development, 
policy refinement...
     -What are examples of application: e.g. technology specific or 
generic: e.g. in NFV, SDN, autonomics, IoT...
     -What relationships/consistency among those applications? i.e. 
towards a comprehensive view of a "Generalized IBN"
     -List of representative use cases of IBN.
     -Practical experiences, developments, tools on IBN.

The network management community has extensive knowledge and expertise 
in the area (think policy based management) that can prove very useful 
in the foreseen investigations.
Network management is also transverse to technologies (e.g. SDN, NFV, 
autonomics...), providing a different perspective to the problem at hand.

---
The first outcome of this activity will be discussed in the joint 
meeting between SDN, NFV and NM research groups to be held at 
IETF96/Berlin (TBC).

This topic is part of the NMRG meeting at NOMS 2016 
(http://noms2016.ieee-noms.org, 25-29 April 2016, Istanbul).

Other events are in the pipe, so stay tuned!


Best regards,
Lisandro and Laurent (NMRG chairs), together with Kohei and Dan (SDN RG 
chairs).
---