Re: [NNTP] Tr: Last Call: draft-elie-nntp-list-additions (Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) Additions to LIST Command) toProposed Standard

Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> Thu, 24 June 2010 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-nntp-bounces+nntpext-archive=ietf.org@lists.eyrie.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-nntpext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-nntpext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB983A682E for <ietfarch-nntpext-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.046, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qM9KS8XpYIVS for <ietfarch-nntpext-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hope.eyrie.org (hope.eyrie.org [166.84.7.155]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497FE3A681E for <nntpext-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hope.eyrie.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hope.eyrie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BA267DE8 for <nntpext-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-nntp@lists.eyrie.org
Delivered-To: ietf-nntp@lists.eyrie.org
Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (smtp1.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.81]) by hope.eyrie.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7F767D78 for <ietf-nntp@lists.eyrie.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 34548178B4E for <ietf-nntp@lists.eyrie.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E5D17853D for <ietf-nntp@lists.eyrie.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 950162F4AB; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
To: ietf-nntp@lists.eyrie.org
In-Reply-To: <41AEA9673EFF4C96BE9F21909D901311@Iulius> ("Julien ÉLIE"'s message of "Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:57:51 +0200")
Organization: The Eyrie
References: <4CA8DF077EAC4BD3A47D2321B72DE801@Iulius> <41AEA9673EFF4C96BE9F21909D901311@Iulius>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:40:54 -0700
Message-ID: <874ogs72hl.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [NNTP] Tr: Last Call: draft-elie-nntp-list-additions (Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) Additions to LIST Command) toProposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf-nntp@lists.eyrie.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: NNTP protocol discussion <ietf-nntp.lists.eyrie.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.eyrie.org/mailman/options/ietf-nntp>, <mailto:ietf-nntp-request@lists.eyrie.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.eyrie.org/pipermail/ietf-nntp>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-nntp@lists.eyrie.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-nntp-request@lists.eyrie.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.eyrie.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-nntp>, <mailto:ietf-nntp-request@lists.eyrie.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-nntp-bounces+nntpext-archive=ietf.org@lists.eyrie.org
Errors-To: ietf-nntp-bounces+nntpext-archive=ietf.org@lists.eyrie.org

Julien ÉLIE <julien@trigofacile.com> writes:

> * A question by Alexey, the Area Director sponsor for the draft:

> LIST MODERATORS
> 2.4.3.  Example

>       Similarly, a "%s" pattern rule cannot be used for the moderation
>       submission template for two moderated newsgroups whose names
>       differ only by the case of their characters.

> Left hand sides of email addresses are actually case sensitive (although
> most end systems treat them as case-insensitive).
> Therefore, is this remark for LIST MODERATORS accurate?  Maybe we should
> say "It is recommended not to use [...]" because, clearly, "cannot"
> is wrong.

> What do you think about that?  Is it the right fix to do?

While the LHS of an email address is case-sensitive in the standard, most
mail systems do not treat it as case-sensitive without going to special
work to configure them to do so, which means that in practice relying on
that case-sensitivity is unlikely to work.  We should probably say that
explicitly, but I think the provision of the text here is correct.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>