[NNTP] Tr: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3977 (1527) -- archive for draft standard

[Julien ÉLIE <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

As erratum 1527 for RFC 3977 was put in the "Held for Document Update"
state <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1527>, here
is the preferred wording that Clive suggested but that we unfortunately
could not put in the final erratum.

I post it here for the archives (because there is currently no public
trace of that new wording), so that it could be properly reviewed
when the NNTP protocol moves from proposed standard to draft standard.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RFC 3977 - Erratum 1527
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

It should be VERIFIED.

The new wording is better than what was originally suggested as
erratum.  It fixes exactly the same issue.
You can see that the current erratum about section 3.2.1 deals with
MODE-READER.  It appeared after discussing with Russ and Clive that
it was better to change section 3.4.2 (mine was just a remark
on section 3.2.1 without any corrected text -- now we have a corrected
text, for 3.4.2).  In fact, I did not know where to put my remark when
I first submitted the bug report.  Clive found a place in RFC 3977
to put it directly in the text, which is far better!

The following sections should be changed (with line breaks removed
in the notes section only, because they are otherwise put at wrong
places in the web version):

Section
-------
3.4.2

Original Text
-------------
However, the server MAY cease to advertise the MODE-READER
capability after the client uses any command except CAPABILITIES.

Corrected Text
--------------
If the client uses a command which will be available in reading mode
and the server will continue to advertise the MODE-READER capability
after responding to that command, the response code 401, with
MODE-READER as the first argument, MUST be returned.  However, the
server MAY cease to advertise the MODE-READER capability after the
client uses any command except CAPABILITIES, in which case the
response code 502 MUST be returned for such commands.

Notes
-----
Here are two examples to illustrate Section 5.3.3 with that clarification.

Example of the 401 response code to indicate that MODE READER is needed:

   [C] CAPABILITIES
   [S] 101 Capability list:
   [S] VERSION 2
   [S] IHAVE
   [S] MODE-READER
   [S] .
   [C] POST
   [S] 401 MODE-READER
   [C] MODE READER
   [S] 200 Reader mode, posting permitted
   [C] CAPABILITIES
   [S] 101 Capability list:
   [S] VERSION 2
   [S] READER
   [S] LIST ACTIVE NEWSGROUPS
   [S] POST
   [S] .

Example of a mode-switching server which does not allow any reader
command to be used, even unsuccessfully, in transit mode:

   [C] CAPABILITIES
   [S] 101 Capability list:
   [S] VERSION 2
   [S] IHAVE
   [S] MODE-READER
   [S] .
   [C] POST
   [S] 502 Transit service only
   [C] CAPABILITIES
   [S] 101 Capability list:
   [S] VERSION 2
   [S] IHAVE
   [S] .
   [C] MODE READER
   [S] 502 Transit service only
   [Server closes connection.]






----- Message d'origine ----- 
De : RFC Errata System
À : Clive, Chris, Lisa, Ned, Russ
Cc : Julien, RFC Editor
Envoyé : mercredi 24 septembre 2008 19:34
Objet : [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3977 (1527)


>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3977,
> "Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3977&eid=1527
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Julien Élie
>
> Section: 3.2.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> 401: The client must change the state of the connection in some other
>   manner.  The first argument of the response MUST be the capability
>   label (see Section 5.2) of the facility that provides the
>   necessary mechanism (usually an extension, which may be a private
>   extension).  The server MUST NOT use this response code except as
>   specified by the definition of the capability in question.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> The 401 code is never dealt with in the whole RFC 3977.  Even the definition of 
> the MODE-READER capability does not indicate when the 401 return code should be 
> used.
> It should be said that it MUST be used in answers to commands only available after 
> having sent MODE READER.  Maybe section 5.3.2 that described the MODE READER 
> command, is the right place to use in order to specify that behaviour.
>
> [C] CAPABILITIES
> [S] 101 Capability list:
> [S] VERSION 2
> [S] IHAVE
> [S] MODE-READER
> [S] .
> [C] POST
> [S] 401 MODE-READER
> [C] MODE READER
> [S] 200 Reader mode, posting permitted
> [C] CAPABILITIES
> [S] 101 Capability list:
> [S] VERSION 2
> [S] READER
> [S] POST
> [S] .
> [C] POST
> [S] 340 Input article; end with <CR-LF>.<CR-LF>
> [C] From: "Demo User" <[e-mail]>
> [C] Newsgroups: misc.test
> [C] Subject: I am just a test article
> [C] Organization: An Example Net
> [C]
> [C] This is just a test article.
> [C] .
> [S] 240 Article received OK
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3977 (draft-ietf-nntpext-base-27)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP)
> Publication Date    : October 2006
> Author(s)           : C. Feather
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : NNTP Extensions
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>