RE: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop
Luís Cordeiro <cordeiro@dei.uc.pt> Tue, 09 January 2007 15:53 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4JIH-0004wd-7q; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:53:45 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4JIF-0004w0-Oa; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:53:43 -0500
Received: from smtp2.dei.uc.pt ([193.137.203.231] helo=smtp.dei.uc.pt) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4JI0-00043w-6O; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:53:43 -0500
Received: from zoing (dhcp-eucpii-12.ci.uc.pt [193.136.207.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.dei.uc.pt (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l09Fqiek000937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:52:44 GMT
From: Luís Cordeiro <cordeiro@dei.uc.pt>
To: 'Martin Stiemerling' <Stiemerling@netlab.nec.de>, 'Roland Bless' <bless@tm.uka.de>, nsis-imp@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:52:33 -0000
Message-ID: <007d01c73406$305ae5a0$8203030a@zoing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028
Thread-Index: AcczH9RSqCS7K1ndRemcFZhSjK4xQQA4s/ggAABNPhA=
In-Reply-To: <113091BD57179D4491C19DA7E10CD696983904@mx1.office>
X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-Information: Please contact helpdesk@dei.uc.pt for more information
X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-49.77, required 3, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 2.03, L_SMTP_AUTH -50.00)
X-FCTUC-DEI-SIC-MailScanner-From: cordeiro@dei.uc.pt
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 10ba05e7e8a9aa6adb025f426bef3a30
Cc: 'NSIS Group' <nsis@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for implementation questions for NSIS protocols <nsis-imp.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/nsis-imp>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis-imp@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp>, <mailto:nsis-imp-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nsis-imp-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Hi all, University of Coimbra implementation is here to stay :D We want to participate in the next interop, but we are still discussing with the implementation team the best date. Probably April, just before easter would be better for us, but as soon as we have a final agreement I will inform everyone. We are currently working in the following NSIS implementations (using the last draft version): - GIST - QoS-NSLP - NAT/FW - HyPath I look forward for the next interop. BR, Luís Cordeiro -----Original Message----- From: Martin Stiemerling [mailto:Stiemerling@netlab.nec.de] Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Janeiro de 2007 15:30 To: Roland Bless; nsis-imp@ietf.org Cc: NSIS Group Subject: RE: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Hi all, Thanks to Roland for organizing this. Before talking about the date of the interop, I would like to get a poll on: - How many implementations we still have - How many implementators are willing to come this interop. Thanks, Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: Roland Bless [mailto:bless@tm.uka.de] > Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 1:23 PM > To: nsis-imp@ietf.org > Cc: 'NSIS Group' > Subject: Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop > > Hi, > > Roland wrote: > > Roland Bless wrote: > >> I just saw that the week from 19.2.-23.2.2007 would be > indeed a good > >> fit, since there is a conference > > > > Since the proposed date above is getting nearer I want to > hear peoples > > opinions once more. Maybe the implementers need more time to finish > > their code? I got one request to shift it after April 1st > that would > > be after the next IETF meeting. That would be ok for me, too. > > What do others think? > > I just noticed that this is right before Easter, so it might > not be a good idea to do it in the week from 2nd-5th of > April. But maybe for other it is good (depends probably on > your travel arrangements and plans for vacations...) I still > want feedback about the proposed dates, either in the week > 19.-23. February, or 2.-5. April > > Regards, > Roland > > _______________________________________________ > NSIS-imp mailing list > NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp > _______________________________________________ nsis mailing list nsis@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis _______________________________________________ NSIS-imp mailing list NSIS-imp@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis-imp
- [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Roland Bless
- RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Luís Cordeiro
- Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Roland Bless
- Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Roland Bless
- Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Roland Bless
- RE: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Luís Cordeiro
- Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Roland Bless
- Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Xiaoming Fu
- Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Roland Bless
- Re: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Luís Cordeiro
- RE: [NSIS] RE: [Nsis-imp] Next Interop Ford, Alan