[NSIS] WG status

Jukka MJ Manner <jukka.manner@tkk.fi> Mon, 26 October 2009 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jukka.manner@tkk.fi>
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A95828C329 for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4yQIXXcUIEo for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-3.hut.fi (smtp-3.hut.fi [130.233.228.93]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300EA28C30D for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115]) by smtp-3.hut.fi (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n9QLSAS2023381 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:28:10 +0200
Received: from smtp-3.hut.fi ([130.233.228.93]) by localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11156-267 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:28:09 +0200 (EET)
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.177]) by smtp-3.hut.fi (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n9QLS0ia023299 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:28:00 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5271E148 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:27:59 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at luuri.netlab.hut.fi
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dejzRYLrqn6r for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:27:55 +0200 (EET)
Received: from mailsrv.netlab.hut.fi (mailsrv.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.190]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754711E140 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:27:55 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [192.168.0.156] (a91-154-4-72.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.154.4.72]) by mailsrv.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230D0120050 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:27:55 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4AE6145B.5070603@tkk.fi>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:27:55 +0200
From: Jukka MJ Manner <jukka.manner@tkk.fi>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: NSIS <nsis@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050000010606020503000006"
X-TKK-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.1.2-hutcc at katosiko.hut.fi
Subject: [NSIS] WG status
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:27:59 -0000

Dear all,

here is a short update on the WG status.

GIST:
- In RFC Editor queue, waiting for the Extensibility/User Guide draft

NSIS ext:
- WGLC passed, waiting for Chair's Write-up (Martin)
- Then to Magnus for AD review

QoS NSLP:
- New Rev submitted, then IETF Last Call

QSPEC:
- New Rev coming up, then IETF Last Call

NAT-FW NSLP:
- Waiting for AD Review
- Has an IPR claim from Nortel

Y.1541:
- New Rev coming, then IETF Last Call

State machine:
- In AD review

RMD QOSM:
- In AD review

Mobility applicability:
- Missing input from Martin, then to AD review

Tunnels:
- Would need more discussion, then a decision on how to proceed

SCTP:
- Would need more discussion, then a decision on how to proceed

Authorization (individual):
- AD review highlighted again that we would need work on authorization
- We have the individual submission, that could be finalized and 
submitted, if approved by the WG.


Regards,
Jukka